Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Long-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
An analysis of the investment activity ratios from 2018 to 2022 reveals a general decline in the efficiency with which assets are utilized to generate revenue. While the company maintained relatively stable turnover levels in the early part of the period, a significant contraction in efficiency is evident in the latter years.
- Fixed Asset Utilization
- Net fixed asset turnover experienced a substantial decrease over the observed period, falling from 14.31 in 2018 to 6.79 by 2022. A critical inflection point occurred between 2020 and 2021, where the ratio dropped from 13.13 to 7.16, suggesting a significant increase in fixed asset investments that has not been matched by a proportional increase in revenue generation.
- Impact of Right-of-Use (ROU) Assets
- The net fixed asset turnover including operating leases showed a sharp decline between 2018 and 2019, moving from 14.31 to 6.29. This abrupt shift indicates a structural change in the balance sheet, likely resulting from the recognition of right-of-use assets. Following this adjustment, the ratio remained relatively suppressed, ending the period at 5.43 in 2022.
- Aggregate Asset and Equity Efficiency
- Total asset turnover and equity turnover exhibit synchronized patterns of decline and stagnation. Total asset turnover decreased from 0.36 in 2018 and 2019 to a low of 0.24 in 2020, before stabilizing around 0.26 by 2022. Similarly, equity turnover peaked at 0.41 in 2019 before declining and settling at 0.32 in 2022. These low ratios suggest a capital-intensive asset structure where revenue generation is not driven by rapid asset turnover.
Overall, the trend indicates that the company's asset base has expanded more rapidly than its corresponding revenue stream, leading to diminished efficiency across all measured investment activity metrics.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Net Fixed Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Net fixed asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Property and equipment, net
= 2,182,399 ÷ 321,250 = 6.79
Analysis of the long-term investment activity reveals a period of sustained revenue growth coupled with a significant acceleration in capital expenditures, leading to a marked decline in the net fixed asset turnover ratio.
- Revenue Growth Trend
- Revenues exhibited a consistent upward trajectory over the five-year period, increasing from US$ 1.19 billion in 2018 to US$ 2.18 billion in 2022. This indicates a steady expansion of top-line performance.
- Net Fixed Asset Expansion
- Property and equipment, net, grew moderately from 2018 to 2020, moving from US$ 83.3 million to US$ 126.3 million. A significant shift occurred in 2021, when the asset base more than doubled to US$ 271.4 million, eventually reaching US$ 321.3 million by the end of 2022.
- Net Fixed Asset Turnover Performance
- The net fixed asset turnover ratio remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2020, ranging from 14.31 to 13.02. However, a sharp contraction is observed in 2021, where the ratio fell to 7.16, continuing a downward trend to 6.79 in 2022.
The observed patterns indicate a divergence between revenue growth and capital investment. While revenues increased linearly, the rapid expansion of the fixed asset base—particularly the surge between 2020 and 2021—outpaced revenue gains. This imbalance resulted in a significant reduction in the net fixed asset turnover ratio, suggesting a decrease in the efficiency with which the company generates revenue from its long-term physical investments.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Net Fixed Asset Turnover (including Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset)
CoStar Group Inc., net fixed asset turnover (including operating lease, right-of-use asset) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Net fixed asset turnover (including operating lease, right-of-use asset) = Revenues ÷ Property and equipment, net (including operating lease, right-of-use asset)
= 2,182,399 ÷ 401,642 = 5.43
Between 2018 and 2022, a consistent upward trajectory in revenues was observed, with totals increasing from $1.19 billion to $2.18 billion. This growth occurred alongside a substantial expansion of net fixed assets, including right-of-use assets, which rose from $83.3 million in 2018 to $401.6 million in 2022. The growth rate of the asset base significantly outpaced the growth rate of revenues, resulting in a notable decline in the net fixed asset turnover ratio.
- Net Fixed Asset Turnover Trend
- The net fixed asset turnover ratio experienced a sharp contraction between 2018 and 2019, falling from 14.31 to 6.29. Despite a brief recovery to 7.06 in 2020, the ratio trended downward again, ending the period at 5.43 in 2022. This indicates a long-term reduction in the revenue generated for every dollar invested in fixed and leased assets.
- Asset Utilization Efficiency
- The marked decrease in the turnover ratio suggests a decline in the efficiency of long-term asset utilization. The transition from a high-turnover environment in 2018 to a lower, more stable range between 5.22 and 5.43 in the final two years suggests that the company's revenue capacity has not scaled proportionally with its investment in property and equipment.
- Investment Patterns
- A significant surge in net fixed assets occurred between 2018 and 2019, where the value nearly tripled. This rapid accumulation of assets, including right-of-use assets, points to a strategic shift toward increased physical infrastructure or expanded lease commitments. The subsequent stabilization of the ratio in 2021 and 2022 suggests that the company is attempting to optimize the revenue output from this expanded asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Total assets
= 2,182,399 ÷ 8,402,470 = 0.26
Between 2018 and 2022, revenues exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from approximately 1.19 billion to 2.18 billion. Simultaneously, the total asset base expanded from 3.31 billion to 8.40 billion. A significant acceleration in asset growth occurred in 2020, where assets increased by approximately 79% year-over-year, while revenues grew by 18% during the same period.
- Total Asset Turnover Trend
- The asset turnover ratio remained stable at 0.36 through 2018 and 2019, indicating a consistent relationship between asset utilization and revenue generation. However, a sharp decline to 0.24 was recorded in 2020, directly correlating with the substantial increase in the total asset base. This contraction suggests that the capital investments or asset acquisitions made during that period did not yield immediate proportional increases in top-line growth.
- Post-2020 Stabilization
- Following the 2020 decline, the ratio experienced a slight recovery to 0.27 in 2021 before settling at 0.26 in 2022. This stabilization at a lower level than the 2018-2019 baseline indicates a shift in asset intensity, suggesting that the company is operating with a larger asset base relative to its revenue-generating capacity than it did in previous years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Equity Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Equity turnover = Revenues ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 2,182,399 ÷ 6,870,121 = 0.32
An analysis of the financial performance from 2018 to 2022 reveals a consistent expansion in both top-line revenue and the company's equity base. However, the rate of equity accumulation has outpaced revenue growth, leading to a general compression of the equity turnover ratio over the observed period.
- Revenue Growth Trends
- A steady upward trajectory in revenues is observed, increasing from US$ 1,191,832 thousand in 2018 to US$ 2,182,399 thousand in 2022. This represents a consistent ability to expand market reach and increase sales volume year-over-year.
- Equity Base Expansion
- Stockholders' equity experienced significant growth, rising from US$ 3,021,942 thousand in 2018 to US$ 6,870,121 thousand in 2022. The magnitude of this increase suggests substantial capital retention or equity financing that has expanded the company's net asset base more aggressively than its operational output.
- Equity Turnover Efficiency
- The equity turnover ratio exhibited volatility with an overall downward trend. After a slight peak of 0.41 in 2019, the ratio declined to 0.31 in 2020, followed by a marginal recovery to 0.34 in 2021 and a subsequent dip to 0.32 in 2022. This pattern indicates a decrease in the efficiency with which the company utilizes its equity to generate revenue.
- Comparative Analysis of Growth Rates
- The divergence between revenue growth and equity growth is the primary driver of the declining turnover ratio. While revenues grew by approximately 83% over the five-year period, stockholders' equity grew by approximately 127%. This imbalance suggests that the company is becoming more capital-intensive or is accumulating surplus equity that is not yet translating into proportional revenue gains.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?