Stock Analysis on Net

CoStar Group Inc. (NASDAQ:CSGP)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since July 26, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

CoStar Group Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


An analysis of the financial performance from 2018 to 2022 reveals a consistent failure to generate positive economic value, as the economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period. The widening gap between operating returns and the cost of capital indicates that the organization did not create economic value for its shareholders during this timeframe.

Economic Profit Trajectory
Economic profit exhibited a deteriorating trend, starting at negative US$ 277,541 thousand in 2018 and declining to negative US$ 930,942 thousand by 2022. A sharp deterioration is observed between 2019 and 2020, where the economic loss more than tripled, reflecting a significant misalignment between capital deployment and profit generation.
Invested Capital Expansion
A substantial increase in invested capital is evident, growing from US$ 3,312,194 thousand in 2018 to US$ 8,182,919 thousand in 2022. The most aggressive expansion occurred between 2019 and 2020, with invested capital increasing by approximately 79% in a single year. This rapid capital accumulation acted as the primary driver for the increased economic deficit.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Performance
NOPAT showed volatility with a general upward movement, peaking at US$ 362,411 thousand in 2021 before receding to US$ 321,495 thousand in 2022. While operating profits grew in absolute terms, the growth rate was insufficient to offset the rising charges associated with the expanded capital base.
Cost of Capital Stability
The cost of capital remained remarkably stable, fluctuating minimally between a high of 15.72% in 2019 and a low of 15.12% in 2021. Because the cost of capital remained constant, the decline in economic profit is attributable to the inefficiency of the invested capital rather than an increase in the required rate of return.

In summary, the data indicates that the aggressive expansion of the capital base has not been matched by a proportional increase in operating profitability. This imbalance has led to an increasing erosion of economic value, as the NOPAT is consistently inadequate to cover the cost of the capital employed.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

CoStar Group Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income8
Investment income, after taxes9
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.

8 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data over the five-year period presents a mixed but generally positive trend in key profitability metrics.

Net Income

Net income showed a generally upward trajectory, starting at $238.3 million in 2018 and increasing to $369.5 million by 2022. A peak was observed in 2019 at nearly $315 million, followed by a decline in 2020 down to approximately $227 million, which may indicate the impact of adverse conditions during that year. The figure rebounded in 2021 with a substantial increase to nearly $293 million and further grew in 2022, reaching the highest level in the period analyzed.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)

NOPAT also exhibited variability throughout the period but maintained an overall upward trend. It began at $240.4 million in 2018 and rose sharply to $333.2 million in 2019. Similar to net income, there was a decline in 2020 to $250.6 million. However, NOPAT increased markedly to $362.4 million in 2021, representing the highest value in the time series, before slightly decreasing to $321.5 million in 2022.

In summary, both net income and NOPAT demonstrate strong performance despite some volatility, particularly in 2020. The decline in 2020 could reflect external challenges faced during that time. The recovery and growth in subsequent years suggest resilience and improved operational efficiency, with net income reaching new highs by 2022, while NOPAT remains elevated above the initial years, indicating sustained profitability from core operations.


Cash Operating Taxes

CoStar Group Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


Provision for income taxes
The provision for income taxes shows a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. It increased significantly from 45,681 thousand USD in 2018 to 75,986 thousand USD in 2019. The amount then decreased to 43,852 thousand USD in 2020, followed by a sharp rise to 111,404 thousand USD in 2021. In 2022, it slightly increased further to 117,004 thousand USD. This pattern indicates volatility in the company's tax provisioning, with notable peaks in 2019, 2021, and 2022.
Cash operating taxes
Cash operating taxes also experienced considerable variability over the analyzed period. Starting at 39,802 thousand USD in 2018, there was a large increase to 65,509 thousand USD in 2019. The figure slightly declined to 60,078 thousand USD in 2020, then increased substantially to 94,697 thousand USD in 2021, and further to 142,190 thousand USD in 2022. This upward trajectory in recent years suggests growing cash outflows related to operating tax obligations.
Comparative insights
Both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes exhibit a generally increasing trend from 2018 through 2022, despite short-term decreases in 2020. Notably, cash operating taxes have increased by approximately 257% over the five years, outpacing the increase in provision for income taxes, which rose by about 156% over the same period. The divergence, especially in 2022 where cash operating taxes exceed the provision by a substantial margin, may indicate timing differences, changes in tax payment schedules, or adjustments related to deferred taxes. This pattern warrants attention for cash flow planning and tax management.

Invested Capital

CoStar Group Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Long-term debt, net
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Deferred revenue4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Available-for-sale investments7
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.


Over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022, several notable trends are evident in the financial structure related to debt, equity, and invested capital.

Total reported debt & leases
This category initially decreased from 2018 to 2019, dropping from approximately $169 million to $150 million. However, it experienced a substantial increase in 2020, rising sharply to over $1.1 billion. Following this spike, the debt level remained relatively stable through 2021 and 2022, with minor decreases each year, concluding near $1.1 billion in 2022. This suggests a significant increase in leverage occurred in 2020, which then plateaued in subsequent years.
Stockholders’ equity
This component demonstrated consistent growth throughout the entire period. Beginning at around $3 billion in 2018, equity increased steadily each year, reaching approximately $3.4 billion in 2019, then accelerating to $5.4 billion in 2020. Growth continued in 2021 and 2022, ending at roughly $6.9 billion. This sustained increase indicates ongoing value creation for shareholders and a strengthening balance sheet in terms of equity financing.
Invested capital
Invested capital also exhibited a robust upward trend. Starting at about $3.3 billion in 2018, it rose gradually to $3.7 billion in 2019 before experiencing a sharp increase to over $6.6 billion in 2020. This growth persisted through 2021 and 2022, peaking at over $8.1 billion. The pattern mirrors the increases seen in both debt and equity, reflecting higher total capitalization and investment in company assets or operations.

In summary, the data reflect a strategic expansion in capital structure beginning in 2020, marked by a significant rise in both debt and equity, alongside a growing invested capital base. The escalation in reported debt and leases coincided with heightened equity levels, suggesting balanced financing efforts rather than reliance on debt alone. The steady increase in stockholders’ equity and invested capital signals stronger capitalization and potentially enhanced investment in growth initiatives during the analyzed period.


Cost of Capital

CoStar Group Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, net3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, net. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

CoStar Group Inc., economic spread ratio calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =


The analysis of economic value metrics from 2018 to 2022 indicates a persistent failure to generate positive economic profit, characterized by a widening gap between returns and the cost of capital. Throughout the five-year period, the organization consistently operated with a negative economic spread, signifying that the returns on invested capital remained below the required threshold for value creation.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative for the entire duration of the analyzed period. While a slight improvement was observed in 2019, a significant deterioration occurred in 2020, where the deficit expanded to -771,979 thousand US$. Despite a marginal recovery in 2021, the economic profit reached its lowest point in 2022 at -930,942 thousand US$, representing a substantial increase in value destruction compared to the 2018 baseline.
Invested Capital Growth
There is a clear upward trajectory in invested capital, which grew from 3,312,194 thousand US$ in 2018 to 8,182,919 thousand US$ by 2022. A notable surge occurred between 2019 and 2020, where invested capital increased by approximately 79%. This aggressive expansion of the capital base occurred concurrently with deepening economic losses, suggesting that the additional capital deployed did not yield immediate economic gains.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
The economic spread ratio remained negative throughout the period, fluctuating between -6.74% and -11.59%. The ratio peaked in 2019 at -6.74%, but declined sharply to -11.59% in 2020. Although it moderated to -9.97% in 2021, it returned to a depressed level of -11.38% in 2022. The persistence of a negative spread confirms that the rate of return on invested capital failed to exceed the cost of capital, leading to a continuous erosion of shareholder value.

The correlation between the rapidly increasing invested capital and the worsening economic profit suggests a period of heavy investment that has yet to translate into economic viability. The inability to stabilize or positive the economic spread ratio indicates that the scale of investment has not yet reached a threshold of efficiency capable of offsetting the cost of the capital employed.


Economic Profit Margin

CoStar Group Inc., economic profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenues
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenues
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =


Between 2018 and 2022, a consistent divergence emerged between revenue growth and economic value creation. While adjusted revenues demonstrated steady year-over-year expansion, economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period, indicating that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed.

Revenue Performance
Adjusted revenues exhibited a strong and uninterrupted upward trajectory, growing from 1,199,321 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 2,189,457 thousand US dollars by 2022. This represents a substantial increase in the top-line scale of operations over the five-year interval.
Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained in negative territory for the duration of the analyzed period. After a slight improvement between 2018 and 2019, there was a sharp deterioration in 2020, where losses widened to 771,979 thousand US dollars. Despite a partial recovery in 2021, the losses reached their peak in 2022 at 930,942 thousand US dollars, suggesting that the cost of investment or operational expenses grew faster than the actual economic value produced.
Economic Profit Margin Dynamics
The economic profit margin reflects a volatile and negative trend. The margin improved from -23.14% in 2018 to a peak of -17.63% in 2019. However, a significant contraction occurred in 2020, with the margin dropping to -46.34%. While 2021 saw a moderate correction to -35.70%, the margin fell again to -42.52% in 2022. This pattern demonstrates that the increase in revenue did not translate into improved economic efficiency; rather, the entity's economic loss relative to its revenue scaled upward significantly after 2019.

The overall financial trajectory indicates an aggressive growth phase where revenue expansion is being achieved at the expense of economic profit. The widening gap between revenue growth and economic profit margin suggests that the capital investments required to drive sales are not yet yielding a positive economic return.