EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
CoStar Group Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Cash Flow Statement
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to CoStar Group Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
Cost of capital2 | ||||||
Invested capital3 | ||||||
Economic profit4 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial analysis over the five-year period reveals several key trends and patterns related to profitability, capital efficiency, and economic value creation.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited fluctuating performance with an overall upward trend from 2018 to 2021, increasing from $240.4 million to $362.4 million. However, there was a decline in 2022 to $321.5 million, reflecting a decrease of approximately 11.3% from the previous year. The data suggests operational profitability improved significantly between 2018 and 2021 before facing some pressure in 2022.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the period, ranging narrowly from 13.55% to 13.62% initially, then gradually declining to 13.11% in 2021 before slightly rising again to 13.27% in 2022. This indicates stable financing costs or required return rates, implying no significant changes in the capital structure or market risks impacting the company’s cost of capital.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital more than doubled from approximately $3.3 billion in 2018 to $6.7 billion in 2020, followed by further steady growth to $8.18 billion in 2022. The sharp increase in 2020 suggests substantial investments or acquisitions, with continued capital deployment through 2022, pointing to an expansion strategy or increased asset base.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative throughout the examined period, indicating the company did not generate returns exceeding its cost of capital. Although the negative economic profit narrowed somewhat from -$208.4 million in 2018 to -$172.4 million in 2019, it then significantly worsened, reaching -$636.1 million in 2020 and remaining substantially negative in subsequent years (-$560.1 million in 2021 and -$764.6 million in 2022). This trend reflects that despite rising NOPAT and invested capital, the returns relative to capital costs were insufficient, suggesting challenges in value creation or possibly high levels of investment diluting profitability.
In summary, the company demonstrated growth in operating profit and invested capital, but persistent negative economic profit highlights ongoing difficulties in generating returns above the cost of capital. The stable cost of capital underscores that these challenges are likely operational or investment-related rather than due to increased financing costs. Future strategic focus could be warranted on improving capital efficiency and ensuring investments translate into adequate returns.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
8 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data over the five-year period presents a mixed but generally positive trend in key profitability metrics.
- Net Income
-
Net income showed a generally upward trajectory, starting at $238.3 million in 2018 and increasing to $369.5 million by 2022. A peak was observed in 2019 at nearly $315 million, followed by a decline in 2020 down to approximately $227 million, which may indicate the impact of adverse conditions during that year. The figure rebounded in 2021 with a substantial increase to nearly $293 million and further grew in 2022, reaching the highest level in the period analyzed.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT also exhibited variability throughout the period but maintained an overall upward trend. It began at $240.4 million in 2018 and rose sharply to $333.2 million in 2019. Similar to net income, there was a decline in 2020 to $250.6 million. However, NOPAT increased markedly to $362.4 million in 2021, representing the highest value in the time series, before slightly decreasing to $321.5 million in 2022.
In summary, both net income and NOPAT demonstrate strong performance despite some volatility, particularly in 2020. The decline in 2020 could reflect external challenges faced during that time. The recovery and growth in subsequent years suggest resilience and improved operational efficiency, with net income reaching new highs by 2022, while NOPAT remains elevated above the initial years, indicating sustained profitability from core operations.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Provision for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes shows a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. It increased significantly from 45,681 thousand USD in 2018 to 75,986 thousand USD in 2019. The amount then decreased to 43,852 thousand USD in 2020, followed by a sharp rise to 111,404 thousand USD in 2021. In 2022, it slightly increased further to 117,004 thousand USD. This pattern indicates volatility in the company's tax provisioning, with notable peaks in 2019, 2021, and 2022.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes also experienced considerable variability over the analyzed period. Starting at 39,802 thousand USD in 2018, there was a large increase to 65,509 thousand USD in 2019. The figure slightly declined to 60,078 thousand USD in 2020, then increased substantially to 94,697 thousand USD in 2021, and further to 142,190 thousand USD in 2022. This upward trajectory in recent years suggests growing cash outflows related to operating tax obligations.
- Comparative insights
- Both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes exhibit a generally increasing trend from 2018 through 2022, despite short-term decreases in 2020. Notably, cash operating taxes have increased by approximately 257% over the five years, outpacing the increase in provision for income taxes, which rose by about 156% over the same period. The divergence, especially in 2022 where cash operating taxes exceed the provision by a substantial margin, may indicate timing differences, changes in tax payment schedules, or adjustments related to deferred taxes. This pattern warrants attention for cash flow planning and tax management.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.
Over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022, several notable trends are evident in the financial structure related to debt, equity, and invested capital.
- Total reported debt & leases
- This category initially decreased from 2018 to 2019, dropping from approximately $169 million to $150 million. However, it experienced a substantial increase in 2020, rising sharply to over $1.1 billion. Following this spike, the debt level remained relatively stable through 2021 and 2022, with minor decreases each year, concluding near $1.1 billion in 2022. This suggests a significant increase in leverage occurred in 2020, which then plateaued in subsequent years.
- Stockholders’ equity
- This component demonstrated consistent growth throughout the entire period. Beginning at around $3 billion in 2018, equity increased steadily each year, reaching approximately $3.4 billion in 2019, then accelerating to $5.4 billion in 2020. Growth continued in 2021 and 2022, ending at roughly $6.9 billion. This sustained increase indicates ongoing value creation for shareholders and a strengthening balance sheet in terms of equity financing.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital also exhibited a robust upward trend. Starting at about $3.3 billion in 2018, it rose gradually to $3.7 billion in 2019 before experiencing a sharp increase to over $6.6 billion in 2020. This growth persisted through 2021 and 2022, peaking at over $8.1 billion. The pattern mirrors the increases seen in both debt and equity, reflecting higher total capitalization and investment in company assets or operations.
In summary, the data reflect a strategic expansion in capital structure beginning in 2020, marked by a significant rise in both debt and equity, alongside a growing invested capital base. The escalation in reported debt and leases coincided with heightened equity levels, suggesting balanced financing efforts rather than reliance on debt alone. The steady increase in stockholders’ equity and invested capital signals stronger capitalization and potentially enhanced investment in growth initiatives during the analyzed period.
Cost of Capital
CoStar Group Inc., cost of capital calculations
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Long-term debt, net3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, net. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
Economic profit1 | ||||||
Invested capital2 | ||||||
Performance Ratio | ||||||
Economic spread ratio3 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit figures show a consistently negative trend throughout the five-year period, indicating that the company has not generated economic profit in any of these years. The losses fluctuated, starting at approximately -208 million USD in 2018, improving slightly in 2019 to about -172 million USD, then deteriorating substantially in 2020 to around -636 million USD. Although there was a modest recovery in 2021 to approximately -560 million USD, the economic profit worsened again in 2022, reaching roughly -765 million USD. This pattern suggests ongoing challenges in generating returns above the cost of capital.
- Invested Capital
- The invested capital has exhibited a steady and significant increase over the period. Beginning at approximately 3.3 billion USD in 2018, it rose to about 3.7 billion USD in 2019 and then surged almost double to around 6.7 billion USD in 2020. The growth continued in 2021 and 2022, reaching roughly 7.0 billion USD and 8.2 billion USD respectively. This increasing trend indicates substantial investment expansion, which may reflect growth initiatives, acquisitions, or capital expenditures.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, reflecting the company's return relative to its cost of capital, remained negative across all years observed. The ratio started at -6.29% in 2018 and improved slightly to -4.64% in 2019, signifying some improvement in earnings efficiency relative to invested capital. However, from 2020 onward, there was deterioration, with the ratio plummeting to -9.55%, then improving marginally to -7.96%, and again declining to -9.34% by the end of 2022. The persistently negative and volatile spread ratio indicates that the company’s returns have consistently fallen short of the cost of capital, with increased volatility during recent years.
- Summary Insights
- The overall analysis reveals a company that has been investing heavily in its capital base, resulting in a near doubling of invested capital from 2018 to 2022. Despite this, economic profit remains consistently negative, and the economic spread ratio is persistently below zero, demonstrating an inability to generate returns above the cost of capital. The substantial capital investments have not translated into economic profit growth, possibly indicating issues with profitability, capital efficiency, or competitive pressures. The negative and fluctuating economic spread suggests further scrutiny of capital allocation and operational performance is warranted to ensure long-term value creation.
Economic Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
- Adjusted Revenues
- The adjusted revenues showed a consistent upward trend over the five-year period. Starting from approximately 1.2 billion USD in 2018, revenues increased steadily each year, reaching nearly 2.2 billion USD by 2022. This indicates robust top-line growth, with compound annual growth reflecting strong business expansion or increased sales volume.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit figures were negative throughout the entire period, indicating that the company incurred economic losses each year. Although there was a slight improvement from 2018 to 2019, where the economic loss decreased from about -208 million USD to -172 million USD, the subsequent years saw significantly larger economic losses. Notably, the loss peaked in 2020 at over -636 million USD before marginally improving in 2021 and then worsening again in 2022 to -765 million USD. This pattern suggests substantial challenges in generating value above the cost of capital despite rising revenues.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin followed a similar negative trend, consistently below zero, which aligns with the negative economic profit values. Starting at -17.37% in 2018, the margin improved to -12.15% in 2019 but then deteriorated sharply to -38.19% in 2020. While there was some recovery in 2021 to -28.52%, the margin worsened again in 2022 to -34.92%. These margins indicate that the company’s operations were not profitable on an economic basis, with a considerable gap between returns and capital costs that became more pronounced during the period analyzed.
- Summary and Insights
- Despite a consistent increase in adjusted revenues, economic profitability declined substantially over the five-year period. The increasing magnitude of negative economic profit and deteriorating economic profit margins suggest that growth in revenues has been accompanied by increased costs, inefficiencies, or capital charges that outweigh revenue gains. This trend signals a need for management to address profitability drivers and cost structures to enhance value creation and sustainable financial performance.