AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Waste Management Inc. (NYSE:WM)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 15, 2022.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

Microsoft Excel

Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

Waste Management Inc., EBITDA calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net income attributable to Waste Management, Inc. 1,816 1,496 1,670 1,925 1,949
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 1 — 1 (2) —
Add: Income tax expense 532 397 434 453 242
Earnings before tax (EBT) 2,349 1,893 2,105 2,376 2,191
Add: Interest expense 375 457 464 384 368
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 2,724 2,350 2,569 2,760 2,559
Add: Depreciation and amortization 1,999 1,671 1,574 1,477 1,376
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 4,723 4,021 4,143 4,237 3,935

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by a general trajectory of growth, interrupted by a period of contraction between 2019 and 2020, followed by a significant recovery in 2021. EBITDA serves as the most resilient metric across this timeframe, consistently maintaining a higher valuation than operating income and net earnings, which underscores the substantial impact of depreciation and amortization on the bottom line.

EBITDA Performance and Trends
EBITDA grew from 3,935 million USD in 2017 to 4,237 million USD in 2018. A gradual decline occurred over the next two years, reaching a period low of 4,021 million USD in 2020. However, a sharp increase is observed in 2021, with EBITDA reaching its five-year peak of 4,723 million USD, representing an 17.5% increase over the previous year.
Operating Profitability and EBIT
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) followed a pattern similar to EBITDA, peaking in 2018 at 2,760 million USD before declining to 2,350 million USD by 2020. The rebound in 2021 to 2,724 million USD indicates a restoration of operational efficiency and revenue strength, nearly returning to 2018 levels.
Net Income and Bottom-Line Volatility
Net income exhibited greater volatility compared to EBITDA. After remaining relatively stable in 2017 and 2018, net income declined steadily to a low of 1,496 million USD in 2020. The recovery in 2021 to 1,816 million USD indicates a strong return to profitability, although it remained below the 2017 peak of 1,949 million USD.
Analysis of Non-Cash Charges
A consistent and significant gap is observed between EBIT and EBITDA throughout the period. For instance, in 2021, the difference was 1,999 million USD. This persistent spread highlights the capital-intensive nature of the business, where depreciation and amortization represent a substantial portion of the total operating expenses.

Overall, the data indicates a strong capacity for recovery. While the 2019-2020 period saw a simultaneous decline in net income, EBT, EBIT, and EBITDA, the 2021 results demonstrate a robust upward correction, particularly in EBITDA and EBT, suggesting improved operational leverage and cash flow generation.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current

Waste Management Inc., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV) 72,442
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 4,723
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA 15.34
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Industry
Industrials 23.34

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical

Waste Management Inc., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)1 72,442 60,043 62,701 51,852 45,929
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 4,723 4,021 4,143 4,237 3,935
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA3 15.34 14.93 15.13 12.24 11.67
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Industry
Industrials 16.30 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2021 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 72,442 ÷ 4,723 = 15.34


A consistent upward trajectory in the enterprise valuation is observed between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a significant expansion in the EV/EBITDA multiple. While operational earnings remained relatively stable for a portion of the period, the market valuation grew at a substantially faster rate, indicating an increase in the premium attributed to the entity.

Enterprise Value (EV) Growth
The enterprise value experienced a steady increase from 45,929 million US$ in 2017 to 72,442 million US$ by the end of 2021. A notable acceleration occurred between 2018 and 2019, followed by a minor contraction in 2020, and a sharp recovery in 2021, where the value reached its peak for the period.
EBITDA Performance
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization showed modest growth and periodic volatility. After increasing to 4,237 million US$ in 2018, EBITDA entered a slight decline phase through 2020, dipping to 4,021 million US$. However, a strong recovery was noted in 2021, with earnings rising to 4,723 million US$.
EV/EBITDA Ratio Evolution
The valuation multiple expanded from 11.67 in 2017 to 15.34 in 2021. The most significant shift occurred in 2019, where the ratio jumped to 15.13. This suggests that the increase in enterprise value was not solely driven by operational growth, but also by multiple expansion, reflecting higher investor confidence or a change in market pricing for the company's cash flows.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?