Solvency ratios also known as long-term debt ratios measure a company ability to meet long-term obligations.
Solvency Ratios (Summary)
Debt Ratios
Coverage Ratios
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The solvency profile between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by a general increase in leverage and a strategic shift in capital structure, with a notable peak in debt utilization occurring in 2019. While leverage ratios shifted upward, the company maintained an adequate ability to service its debt, ending the period with a significant recovery in coverage metrics.
- Leverage and Capital Structure
- Debt to equity ratios experienced a marked increase, rising from 1.58 in 2017 to a peak of 1.91 in 2019, before stabilizing around 1.88 by 2021. When accounting for operating lease liabilities, the ratio reached a high of 1.97 in 2019. Debt to capital ratios remained relatively stable, showing a slight increase from 0.61 to 0.65, suggesting that the increase in debt was partially offset by growth in equity, maintaining a consistent capital composition over the five-year period.
- Asset Utilization and Financial Leverage
- The debt to assets ratio followed a trend similar to the debt to equity metrics, increasing from 0.43 in 2017 to a peak of 0.49 in 2019, and subsequently moderating to 0.46 by 2021. In contrast, financial leverage demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory, climbing from 3.63 in 2017 to 4.08 in 2021, indicating an increased reliance on debt to finance the asset base over the long term.
- Debt Service Coverage
- Interest coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios exhibited a U-shaped trend. Interest coverage declined from a high of 7.19 in 2018 to a low of 5.14 in 2020, before rebounding strongly to 7.26 in 2021. Fixed charge coverage mirrored this volatility, dropping from 5.63 in 2018 to 4.17 in 2020, then recovering to 5.43. This pattern suggests a temporary compression of earnings relative to fixed obligations during the 2019-2020 period, followed by a restoration of solvency margins in the final year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Equity
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Total Waste Management, Inc. stockholders’ equity
= 13,405 ÷ 7,124 = 1.88
The solvency profile of Waste Management Inc. from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by an increase in financial leverage, specifically marked by a significant rise in debt during 2019, followed by a period of relative stabilization. Although stockholders' equity grew for the majority of the period, the accumulation of debt outpaced this growth, leading to a higher debt-to-equity ratio by the end of the analyzed timeframe.
- Total Debt Trends
- Total debt experienced a general upward trajectory, rising from US$ 9,491 million in 2017 to a peak of US$ 13,810 million in 2020. The most substantial increase occurred between 2018 and 2019, during which debt rose by approximately US$ 3,472 million. A slight reduction was observed in 2021, with the balance decreasing to US$ 13,405 million.
- Stockholders' Equity Trends
- Stockholders' equity demonstrated steady growth from 2017 through 2020, increasing from US$ 6,019 million to US$ 7,452 million. This growth trend reversed slightly in 2021, as equity declined to US$ 7,124 million.
- Debt to Equity Ratio Analysis
- The debt to equity ratio remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2018, moving from 1.58 to 1.60. A sharp increase to 1.91 was recorded in 2019, reflecting the aggressive expansion of debt relative to equity. For the remainder of the period, the ratio plateaued, fluctuating between 1.85 and 1.88, indicating a sustained higher level of leverage compared to the 2017 baseline.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Equity (including Operating Lease Liability)
Waste Management Inc., debt to equity (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to equity (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total Waste Management, Inc. stockholders’ equity
= 13,928 ÷ 7,124 = 1.96
The solvency profile of the organization indicates a general increase in financial leverage over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. While both total debt and stockholders' equity grew during this interval, the rate of debt accumulation outpaced the growth in equity, particularly during the 2019 fiscal year.
- Total Debt Accumulation
- Total debt, inclusive of operating lease liabilities, experienced a steady increase from US$ 9,491 million in 2017 to US$ 10,026 million in 2018, followed by a substantial surge to US$ 13,943 million in 2019. This represents a significant expansion of the debt base within a single year. Debt levels remained relatively stable thereafter, peaking at US$ 14,326 million in 2020 before slightly declining to US$ 13,928 million by the end of 2021.
- Stockholders' Equity Trends
- Equity demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory from 2017 through 2020, rising from US$ 6,019 million to US$ 7,452 million. A marginal contraction occurred in 2021, with equity closing at US$ 7,124 million. Despite this late-period decline, the overall equity base remained higher in 2021 than at the beginning of the analyzed period.
- Debt to Equity Ratio Analysis
- The debt to equity ratio remained relatively stable between 1.58 and 1.60 from 2017 to 2018. A sharp increase to 1.97 was observed in 2019, coinciding with the significant rise in total debt. For the remainder of the period, the ratio stabilized at a higher plateau, recording 1.92 in 2020 and 1.96 in 2021. This suggests a structural shift in the capital composition toward a higher reliance on debt financing relative to equity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= 13,405 ÷ 20,529 = 0.65
An examination of the solvency metrics from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of expansion in both debt and total capital, followed by a stabilization phase. The company experienced a notable increase in its leverage profile during the first three years of the period before maintaining a consistent capital structure through 2021.
- Total Debt Trends
- Total debt exhibited a steady upward trend from 2017 to 2020, increasing from 9,491 million USD to a peak of 13,810 million USD. This growth was most pronounced between 2018 and 2019, where debt increased by approximately 3,472 million USD. A slight reduction was observed in 2021, with the balance decreasing to 13,405 million USD.
- Total Capital Trends
- Total capital followed a growth pattern similar to that of total debt, rising from 15,510 million USD in 2017 to a maximum of 21,262 million USD in 2020. In 2021, total capital contracted to 20,529 million USD, mirroring the slight decline seen in total debt.
- Debt to Capital Ratio Analysis
- The debt to capital ratio increased from 0.61 in 2017 to 0.66 in 2019, indicating an increase in the proportion of debt used to finance the company's capital structure. Following this peak, the ratio remained stable at 0.65 for both 2020 and 2021. This stability suggests that the company has maintained a disciplined approach to its leverage ratio over the most recent two years of the analysis period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Capital (including Operating Lease Liability)
Waste Management Inc., debt to capital (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to capital (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total capital (including operating lease liability)
= 13,928 ÷ 21,052 = 0.66
The solvency profile indicates a period of capital expansion followed by a stabilization of leverage. Total debt and total capital both experienced significant growth between 2017 and 2020, with the debt-to-capital ratio increasing slightly before remaining constant for the final three years of the analyzed period.
- Total Debt Evolution
- Total debt, inclusive of operating lease liabilities, grew steadily from US$ 9,491 million in 2017 to US$ 14,326 million in 2020. The most substantial increase occurred between 2018 and 2019, where debt rose by approximately 39%. A slight reduction was observed in 2021, with debt decreasing to US$ 13,928 million.
- Total Capital Growth
- Total capital followed a trajectory similar to that of total debt, rising from US$ 15,510 million in 2017 to a peak of US$ 21,778 million in 2020. The significant jump in 2019 suggests a concurrent increase in both debt and equity components of the capital structure. Total capital decreased slightly to US$ 21,052 million by the end of 2021.
- Debt to Capital Ratio Analysis
- The debt to capital ratio shifted from 0.61 in 2017 to 0.66 in 2019. Despite the fluctuations in absolute debt and capital values between 2019 and 2021, the ratio remained stagnant at 0.66. This indicates that the proportional relationship between debt and total capital was maintained consistently throughout the latter part of the period, reflecting a stabilized capital structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Assets
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to assets = Total debt ÷ Total assets
= 13,405 ÷ 29,097 = 0.46
The analysis of solvency indicators reveals a period of capital expansion followed by a phase of relative stabilization. Between 2017 and 2021, an increase in both total leverage and the asset base is evident, with the debt-to-assets ratio fluctuating within a range of 0.43 to 0.49.
- Total Debt Evolution
- An upward trajectory in total debt is observed from 2017 through 2020, increasing from US$ 9,491 million to a peak of US$ 13,810 million. A modest reduction occurred in 2021, with total debt descending to US$ 13,405 million.
- Total Assets Growth
- Total assets exhibited significant growth, most notably in 2019, where a sharp increase occurred from US$ 22,650 million to US$ 27,743 million. By the end of 2021, the asset base reached US$ 29,097 million, representing a substantial expansion in the company's overall resource position over the analyzed period.
- Debt to Assets Ratio Trends
- The debt to assets ratio remained stable at 0.43 and 0.44 during 2017 and 2018, respectively, before rising to a peak of 0.49 in 2019. This peak aligns with the most significant annual increase in total debt. Following 2019, a downward trend is observed, with the ratio improving to 0.47 in 2020 and 0.46 in 2021, indicating a slight reduction in the proportion of assets financed through debt.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Debt to Assets (including Operating Lease Liability)
Waste Management Inc., debt to assets (including operating lease liability) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to assets (including operating lease liability) = Total debt (including operating lease liability) ÷ Total assets
= 13,928 ÷ 29,097 = 0.48
The solvency profile from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a period of significant expansion in both leverage and the asset base, with a peak in the debt-to-asset ratio occurring in 2019 followed by a period of relative stabilization.
- Debt and Asset Growth Trends
- Total debt, including operating lease liabilities, increased from US$ 9,491 million in 2017 to a peak of US$ 14,326 million in 2020. The most substantial growth occurred between 2018 and 2019, where debt rose by approximately US$ 3,917 million. This increase was mirrored by a corresponding rise in total assets, which grew from US$ 21,829 million in 2017 to US$ 29,345 million in 2020, suggesting that the additional leverage was utilized to fund asset acquisition or expansion.
- Debt to Assets Ratio Analysis
- The debt to assets ratio trended upward from 0.43 in 2017 to a peak of 0.50 in 2019. This progression indicates that by 2019, 50% of the total assets were financed through debt and lease obligations. Following this peak, the ratio experienced a slight downward trajectory, moving to 0.49 in 2020 and 0.48 in 2021, reflecting a modest reduction in the proportion of debt relative to total assets.
- Recent Solvency Stability
- In the final year of the analyzed period, a simultaneous decrease in both total debt and total assets is observed. Total debt declined to US$ 13,928 million and total assets fell to US$ 29,097 million by December 31, 2021. This synchronized movement resulted in a stabilized solvency ratio of 0.48, indicating a consistent capital structure and a controlled approach to leverage in the most recent reporting cycles.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Waste Management, Inc. stockholders’ equity
= 29,097 ÷ 7,124 = 4.08
An analysis of the solvency metrics between 2017 and 2021 reveals a consistent upward trajectory in financial leverage, indicating an increasing reliance on debt or external financing relative to equity to fund asset growth.
- Asset and Equity Growth Patterns
- Total assets experienced significant expansion over the period, rising from 21,829 million USD in 2017 to a peak of 29,345 million USD in 2020, before a slight contraction to 29,097 million USD in 2021. Stockholders' equity followed a similar growth pattern, increasing from 6,019 million USD in 2017 to 7,452 million USD in 2020, followed by a decrease to 7,124 million USD in 2021.
- Financial Leverage Trend
- The financial leverage ratio exhibited a general increase, moving from 3.63 in 2017 to 4.08 by the end of 2021. After a marginal decline to 3.61 in 2018, the ratio climbed more sharply in 2019 to 3.93 and continued to rise through 2021.
- Solvency Interpretation
- The divergence between asset growth and equity growth is most evident between 2018 and 2021. While both assets and equity increased, the pace of asset accumulation exceeded the growth of the equity base, resulting in the observed rise in financial leverage. This suggests a strategic shift toward higher leverage to support the balance sheet expansion.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Coverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Interest coverage = EBIT ÷ Interest expense
= 2,724 ÷ 375 = 7.26
The analysis of interest coverage from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of volatility characterized by a mid-term decline in solvency margins followed by a strong recovery in the final year.
- Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) Trends
- Operating earnings experienced fluctuations over the five-year period, peaking at US$ 2,760 million in 2018. A downward trend followed, with EBIT reaching a period low of US$ 2,350 million in 2020. A significant recovery was observed in 2021, as earnings rose to US$ 2,724 million.
- Interest Expense Dynamics
- Interest expenses remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2018 but increased sharply in 2019 to US$ 464 million. This elevated cost structure persisted through 2020 before a notable reduction occurred in 2021, with expenses dropping to US$ 375 million, returning to levels comparable to the 2017-2018 period.
- Interest Coverage Ratio Performance
- The interest coverage ratio exhibited a V-shaped pattern. After reaching 7.19 in 2018, the ratio declined for two consecutive years, hitting a low of 5.14 in 2020. This compression was the result of coinciding decreases in operating income and increases in interest obligations. In 2021, the ratio rebounded sharply to 7.26, the highest value in the observed period, indicating a strengthened capacity to service debt.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Fixed Charge Coverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Fixed charge coverage = Earnings before fixed charges and tax ÷ Fixed charges
= 2,879 ÷ 530 = 5.43
The fixed charge coverage ratio exhibited a fluctuating trend between 2017 and 2021, characterized by an initial peak, a two-year contraction, and a subsequent recovery to near-initial levels.
- Earnings before fixed charges and tax
- Earnings showed volatility over the period, increasing from 2,693 million US$ in 2017 to a peak of 2,889 million US$ in 2018. A downward trend followed, with earnings declining to 2,701 million US$ in 2019 and reaching a period low of 2,490 million US$ in 2020. A significant recovery was observed in 2021, as earnings rose to 2,879 million US$.
- Fixed charges
- Fixed charges remained relatively stable in 2017 and 2018 at 502 million US$ and 513 million US$, respectively. A notable increase occurred in 2019, with charges rising to 596 million US$ and remaining nearly flat at 597 million US$ in 2020. This upward trend reversed in 2021, as fixed charges decreased to 530 million US$.
- Fixed charge coverage ratio
- The coverage ratio peaked at 5.63 in 2018, reflecting strong earnings relative to fixed obligations. Between 2019 and 2020, the ratio declined to 4.53 and then to 4.17, driven by the simultaneous decrease in earnings and the increase in fixed charges. By 2021, the ratio rebounded to 5.43, indicating a strengthened ability to cover fixed charges resulting from both improved earnings and reduced fixed costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?