Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Ecolab Inc. (NYSE:ECL)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 25, 2022.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

Ecolab Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 5.11 5.37 5.79 5.58 5.12
Receivables turnover 5.14 5.19 5.33 5.51 5.38
Payables turnover 5.50 5.95 6.79 6.87 6.29
Working capital turnover 11.23 5.40 12.44 14.79 11.88
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 71 68 63 65 71
Add: Average receivable collection period 71 70 68 66 68
Operating cycle 142 138 131 131 139
Less: Average payables payment period 66 61 54 53 58
Cash conversion cycle 76 77 77 78 81

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of the five-year period indicates a general expansion of the operating cycle, which is systematically offset by an extension of the payables payment period to maintain a stable and slightly improving cash conversion cycle.

Inventory and Receivables Management
Inventory efficiency peaked in 2019 with a turnover ratio of 5.79 and a processing period of 63 days. Following this peak, there was a decline in turnover to 5.11 by 2021, returning the processing period to 71 days. Simultaneously, receivables turnover exhibited a gradual downward trend from 5.51 in 2018 to 5.14 in 2021, with the average collection period increasing from 66 to 71 days over the same interval.
Payables and Liquidity Strategy
A consistent decline in payables turnover is observed from 6.87 in 2018 to 5.50 in 2021. This reflects a strategic extension of the average payables payment period, which increased from 53 days in 2018 to 66 days in 2021. This trend suggests a deliberate effort to retain cash within the organization by slowing payments to suppliers.
Operating Cycle and Cash Conversion Cycle
The operating cycle, which represents the time from initial inventory investment to cash collection, showed improvement between 2017 and 2019, dropping from 139 to 131 days. However, it expanded to 142 days by 2021. Despite this expansion, the cash conversion cycle remained remarkably stable and trended slightly downward, moving from 81 days in 2017 to 76 days in 2021, confirming that the extension of payables has effectively mitigated the slowing of inventory and receivable turns.
Working Capital Utilization
Working capital turnover displayed significant volatility throughout the period. After reaching a high of 14.79 in 2018, the ratio experienced a sharp contraction to 5.40 in 2020, before rebounding to 11.23 in 2021. This suggests substantial fluctuations in the relationship between net working capital and annual sales during the 2020 fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

Ecolab Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Cost of sales, including special charges 7,615,800 6,905,800 8,723,400 8,625,900 7,405,100
Inventories 1,491,800 1,285,200 1,505,600 1,546,400 1,445,900
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 5.11 5.37 5.79 5.58 5.12
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Linde plc 10.12 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 5.92 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Chemicals 7.91 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Materials 5.27 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales, including special charges ÷ Inventories
= 7,615,800 ÷ 1,491,800 = 5.11

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating trend in inventory management efficiency between 2017 and 2021. The overall trajectory shows an initial improvement in turnover efficiency, followed by a period of volatility and a subsequent return to baseline levels.

Inventory Turnover Trend
The inventory turnover ratio exhibited a steady upward trajectory from 5.12 in 2017 to a peak of 5.79 in 2019. This indicates a period of increasing operational efficiency, where inventory was converted into sales more rapidly. This trend reversed after 2019, with the ratio declining to 5.37 in 2020 and further decreasing to 5.11 by the end of 2021.
Cost of Sales and Inventory Correlation
Cost of sales increased from US$ 7.4 billion in 2017 to a peak of US$ 8.7 billion in 2019, which aligned with the peak in turnover efficiency. A significant contraction occurred in 2020, with the cost of sales falling to US$ 6.9 billion. Although inventories were reduced to US$ 1.29 billion during the same period to offset the decline in sales activity, the turnover ratio still experienced a decrease. By 2021, cost of sales recovered to US$ 7.6 billion, but inventories rose more aggressively to US$ 1.49 billion, causing the turnover ratio to drop to its lowest point in the five-year period.
Operational Efficiency Insights
The convergence of the 2021 turnover ratio (5.11) with the 2017 level (5.12) indicates that the efficiency gains achieved between 2018 and 2019 were not sustained. The discrepancy in 2021, where inventory levels increased faster than the recovery of the cost of sales, suggests a potential shift toward higher safety stock levels or a response to supply chain disruptions, resulting in a slower velocity of inventory movement.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

Ecolab Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net sales 12,733,100 11,790,200 14,906,300 14,668,200 13,838,300
Accounts receivable, net 2,478,400 2,273,800 2,796,500 2,662,500 2,574,100
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 5.14 5.19 5.33 5.51 5.38
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Linde plc 6.84 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 8.48 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Chemicals 7.41 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Materials 9.18 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Accounts receivable, net
= 12,733,100 ÷ 2,478,400 = 5.14

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2017 and 2021, the company experienced significant volatility in top-line revenue and a corresponding fluctuation in its accounts receivable balance. Net sales increased steadily from 2017 to a peak in 2019, followed by a sharp contraction in 2020 and a moderate recovery in 2021. Despite these swings in volume, the efficiency of credit collection remained relatively stable, although a gradual decline in the turnover ratio is evident over the latter half of the period.

Net Sales and Receivables Correlation
Net sales grew from US$ 13.8 billion in 2017 to US$ 14.9 billion in 2019. During this expansion, net accounts receivable rose proportionally from US$ 2.57 billion to US$ 2.80 billion. A significant contraction occurred in 2020, where sales dropped to US$ 11.79 billion, resulting in a reduction of accounts receivable to US$ 2.27 billion. By 2021, both metrics began to trend upward again, with sales reaching US$ 12.73 billion and receivables increasing to US$ 2.48 billion.
Receivables Turnover Trend
The receivables turnover ratio peaked in 2018 at 5.51, indicating the highest efficiency in converting receivables to cash during the analyzed period. Following this peak, a consistent downward trend is observed, with the ratio declining to 5.33 in 2019, 5.19 in 2020, and reaching a five-year low of 5.14 in 2021.
Operational Insight
The steady decrease in the turnover ratio from 2018 to 2021 suggests a slight deceleration in the collection cycle. While the company maintained a consistent range of activity, the movement from 5.51 to 5.14 indicates that the average time required to collect outstanding payments has marginally increased, regardless of the overall fluctuations in annual sales volume.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

Ecolab Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Cost of sales, including special charges 7,615,800 6,905,800 8,723,400 8,625,900 7,405,100
Accounts payable 1,384,200 1,160,600 1,284,300 1,255,600 1,177,100
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 5.50 5.95 6.79 6.87 6.29
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Linde plc 5.01 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 4.74 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Chemicals 4.90 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Materials 5.41 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales, including special charges ÷ Accounts payable
= 7,615,800 ÷ 1,384,200 = 5.50

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating yet ultimately downward trend in the payables turnover ratio between 2017 and 2021. While the ratio initially improved, the subsequent decline indicates a lengthening of the period required to settle obligations with suppliers.

Payables Turnover Trend
The payables turnover ratio increased from 6.29 in 2017 to a peak of 6.87 in 2018, suggesting a more rapid settlement of supplier invoices. However, this trend reversed after 2018, with the ratio declining to 6.79 in 2019, 5.95 in 2020, and reaching a period low of 5.50 by December 31, 2021. This consistent decrease over the final three years suggests a shift toward slower payment cycles.
Impact of Cost of Sales Volatility
Cost of sales experienced significant variance, rising from 7.4 billion US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 8.7 billion US dollars in 2019. A sharp contraction occurred in 2020, where costs fell to 6.9 billion US dollars, which contributed to the drop in turnover as the volume of purchases decreased. Although costs recovered to 7.6 billion US dollars in 2021, the turnover ratio continued to fall, indicating that the increase in liabilities outweighed the increase in operational spending.
Accounts Payable Management
Accounts payable remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2020, fluctuating within a narrow range between 1.16 billion and 1.28 billion US dollars. A significant shift occurred in 2021, when accounts payable rose to 1.38 billion US dollars. The growth in total payables during 2021, coupled with the decline in the turnover ratio, suggests an intentional or operational extension of payment terms, which may serve to preserve cash flow at the expense of faster supplier reimbursement.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

Ecolab Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Current assets 4,687,100 5,117,400 4,828,400 4,677,700 4,596,400
Less: Current liabilities 3,553,200 2,932,200 3,630,600 3,685,600 3,431,800
Working capital 1,133,900 2,185,200 1,197,800 992,100 1,164,600
 
Net sales 12,733,100 11,790,200 14,906,300 14,668,200 13,838,300
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 11.23 5.40 12.44 14.79 11.88
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Linde plc — — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. — — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Chemicals — — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Materials 15.37 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 12,733,100 ÷ 1,133,900 = 11.23

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of operating activity ratios from 2017 through 2021 reveals significant volatility in the efficiency of working capital utilization, characterized by a period of stability, a sharp contraction in 2020, and a subsequent recovery in 2021.

Net Sales Performance
Net sales demonstrated steady growth between 2017 and 2019, increasing from 13.84 billion to 14.91 billion US dollars. A significant contraction occurred in 2020, where sales dropped to 11.79 billion US dollars. By 2021, a partial recovery was observed, with sales rising to 12.73 billion US dollars.
Working Capital Trends
Working capital remained relatively consistent from 2017 to 2019, ranging between 992 million and 1.20 billion US dollars. A substantial spike occurred in 2020, during which working capital reached a five-year peak of 2.19 billion US dollars. This figure corrected sharply in 2021, returning to 1.13 billion US dollars, nearly aligning with 2017 levels.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio peaked in 2018 at 14.79, reflecting a high degree of efficiency in generating sales relative to the invested working capital. A critical decline was observed in 2020, where the ratio plummeted to 5.40. This downturn resulted from the combined effect of diminishing net sales and a doubling of working capital. The 2021 recovery to a ratio of 11.23 indicates a return toward historical efficiency levels, driven by the reduction of working capital and a moderate increase in sales volume.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

Ecolab Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 5.11 5.37 5.79 5.58 5.12
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 71 68 63 65 71
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Linde plc 36 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 62 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Chemicals 46 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Materials 69 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.11 = 71

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of inventory management efficiency from 2017 to 2021 reveals a cyclical trend characterized by a period of operational optimization followed by a return to baseline levels.

Inventory Turnover Performance
A positive trend in inventory turnover was observed between 2017 and 2019, with the ratio increasing from 5.12 to a peak of 5.79. This indicates an acceleration in the frequency with which inventory was replaced. This momentum reversed after 2019, as the ratio declined to 5.37 in 2020 and further decreased to 5.11 by December 31, 2021, effectively returning the metric to its 2017 level.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The processing period moved in inverse correlation to the turnover ratio, decreasing from 71 days in 2017 to a low of 63 days in 2019. This reduction reflects an improvement in the speed of inventory throughput. However, the period expanded over the following two years, rising to 68 days in 2020 and returning to 71 days by the end of 2021.
Overall Efficiency Analysis
The data demonstrates that the gains in inventory efficiency achieved through 2019 were fully offset by 2021. The return to a 71-day processing period and a 5.11 turnover ratio suggests a normalization or a regression in the efficiency of the inventory cycle, resulting in a longer duration for stock to be processed and sold compared to the 2019 peak.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

Ecolab Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 5.14 5.19 5.33 5.51 5.38
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 71 70 68 66 68
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Linde plc 53 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 43 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Chemicals 49 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Materials 40 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.14 = 71

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2017 and 2021 reveals a slight deterioration in the efficiency of receivables management following a peak in performance during the 2018 fiscal year.

Receivables Turnover
The turnover ratio exhibited an initial increase from 5.38 in 2017 to 5.51 in 2018. However, a consistent downward trajectory followed, with the ratio declining to 5.33 in 2019, 5.19 in 2020, and reaching 5.14 by the end of 2021. This pattern indicates a gradual reduction in the frequency with which average accounts receivable are converted into cash over the five-year period.
Average Receivable Collection Period
Mirroring the turnover trends, the collection period decreased from 68 days in 2017 to a minimum of 66 days in 2018. Subsequently, the period expanded steadily, rising to 68 days in 2019, 70 days in 2020, and 71 days in 2021. This increase suggests that the time required to collect payments from customers has lengthened by five days relative to the 2018 low.

The inverse correlation between the declining turnover ratio and the increasing collection period confirms a gradual slowing of the cash conversion cycle regarding receivables. While the fluctuations are marginal, the trend since 2018 points toward a less aggressive collection posture or a shift in customer payment behavior.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

Ecolab Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 71 68 63 65 71
Average receivable collection period 71 70 68 66 68
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 142 138 131 131 139
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Linde plc 89 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 105 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Sector
Chemicals 95 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Industry
Materials 109 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 71 + 71 = 142

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term activity ratios from 2017 to 2021 reveals a fluctuating trend in operational efficiency. The overall operating cycle experienced an initial contraction, reaching its lowest point in 2018 and 2019, followed by a steady expansion through 2021, ultimately exceeding the initial 2017 duration.

Average Inventory Processing Period
A U-shaped trajectory is observed in inventory management. The processing period decreased from 71 days in 2017 to a low of 63 days in 2019, indicating an improvement in inventory turnover. However, this efficiency gain was reversed in the subsequent two years, with the period increasing to 68 days in 2020 and returning to 71 days by December 31, 2021.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables remained relatively stable compared to inventory movements, though a gradual upward trend is evident starting in 2018. After a slight improvement to 66 days in 2018, the collection period rose incrementally each year, reaching 71 days in 2021. This indicates a marginal slowing in the conversion of accounts receivable into cash.
Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle reflects the combined impact of inventory and receivable durations. The cycle shortened from 139 days in 2017 to 131 days during 2018 and 2019. This trend reversed after 2019, with the cycle lengthening to 138 days in 2020 and peaking at 142 days in 2021. The net increase of 3 days over the five-year period is primarily driven by the return of inventory processing times to 2017 levels and a slight deterioration in receivable collection speed.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

Ecolab Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 5.50 5.95 6.79 6.87 6.29
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 66 61 54 53 58
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Linde plc 73 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 77 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Chemicals 74 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Materials 67 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.50 = 66

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a notable shift in the management of accounts payable from 2017 through 2021. While there was an initial period of acceleration in payment settlements, the subsequent years demonstrate a consistent trend toward extending the payment cycle.

Payables Turnover
A fluctuation is observed in the payables turnover ratio, which peaked at 6.87 in 2018 before entering a steady decline. By December 31, 2021, the ratio decreased to 5.50. This downward trajectory suggests a reduction in the frequency with which accounts payable are settled throughout the fiscal year.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average period for settling obligations mirrored the inverse trend of the turnover ratio. After reaching a minimum of 53 days in 2018, the payment period expanded incrementally to 54 days in 2019, 61 days in 2020, and 66 days by the end of 2021. This increase of 13 days from the 2018 low indicates a shift toward retaining cash for longer durations before fulfilling supplier obligations.

Collectively, the evidence reveals an expansion of the payables cycle. The inverse correlation between the declining turnover ratio and the increasing payment period reflects a trend of slower liability liquidation, which may be indicative of changes in supplier credit terms or a deliberate working capital management strategy to preserve liquidity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

Ecolab Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 71 68 63 65 71
Average receivable collection period 71 70 68 66 68
Average payables payment period 66 61 54 53 58
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 76 77 77 78 81
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Linde plc 16 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 28 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Chemicals 21 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Materials 42 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 71 + 71 – 66 = 76

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The cash conversion cycle exhibited a consistent downward trend from 2017 to 2021, decreasing from 81 days to 76 days. This reduction indicates a gradual improvement in the efficiency of working capital management, as the time required to convert resource investments into cash has shortened over the five-year period.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory management followed a U-shaped trajectory. An initial improvement was observed between 2017 and 2019, with the processing period dropping from 71 to 63 days. However, this trend reversed after 2019, returning to 71 days by 2021, suggesting an increase in the duration that inventory is held prior to sale.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The duration for collecting receivables remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 66 and 71 days. A slight upward trajectory is noted from 2018 to 2021, indicating a marginal increase in the average time taken to collect payments from customers.
Average Payables Payment Period
A significant shift occurred in the management of payables. Following a slight decline between 2017 and 2018, the payment period expanded from 54 days in 2019 to 66 days in 2021. This trend reflects a strategic extension of payment terms to suppliers.

The overall compression of the cash conversion cycle is primarily attributed to the expansion of the payables payment period. The increase in the time allowed for paying suppliers effectively offset the simultaneous increases in both inventory processing and receivable collection times observed between 2019 and 2021, thereby facilitating a net improvement in the liquidity cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?