EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Ecolab Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Ecolab Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period between 2017 and 2021 demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) fluctuates, it does not sufficiently offset the cost of capital applied to the invested capital base, resulting in an economic loss each year.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased from US$1,369,555 thousand in 2017 to US$1,771,309 thousand in 2018, representing a substantial gain. However, this was followed by a decrease to US$1,736,725 thousand in 2019. A more significant decline occurred in 2020, with NOPAT falling to US$1,206,880 thousand, likely influenced by external factors. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, with NOPAT reaching US$1,348,902 thousand, but remained below the 2017 and 2018 levels.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited an increasing trend from 14.68% in 2017 to 15.63% in 2020. This increase in the cost of funding contributed to the widening economic loss during this period. A slight decrease to 14.96% was noted in 2021, but the cost remained elevated compared to earlier years.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased from US$17,388,578 thousand in 2017 to US$18,090,500 thousand in 2019. A notable reduction occurred in 2020, decreasing to US$15,595,900 thousand, potentially due to divestitures or asset write-downs. Invested capital then increased again in 2021, reaching US$18,430,300 thousand, surpassing the 2019 level.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the analyzed period. The magnitude of the loss increased year-over-year, moving from -US$1,182,699 thousand in 2017 to -US$1,408,929 thousand in 2021. This indicates a growing disparity between the returns generated by the invested capital and the cost of that capital. The largest economic loss occurred in 2021, despite the slight decrease in the cost of capital, suggesting that the increase in invested capital outweighed the benefit of the lower cost.
In summary, the organization consistently failed to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital during the examined timeframe. Fluctuations in NOPAT and invested capital, coupled with a generally increasing cost of capital, contributed to the worsening economic loss observed over the five-year period.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for expected credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring liability.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to Ecolab.
6 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to Ecolab.
9 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
11 Elimination of discontinued operations.
- Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Ecolab
- The net income attributable to Ecolab exhibited positive values from 2017 through 2019, with a slight decrease in 2018 followed by a recovery in 2019. However, in 2020, there was a significant decline, reflected by a net loss of approximately 1.2 billion US dollars. This downturn was reversed in 2021, where net income returned to a positive figure, measuring around 1.13 billion US dollars, although still below the 2019 peak.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT showed an overall increasing trend from 2017 to 2019, starting at about 1.37 billion US dollars and peaking at roughly 1.74 billion US dollars in 2019. In 2020, similar to net income, NOPAT experienced a decline but remained positive at about 1.21 billion US dollars. In 2021, there was a moderate recovery, with NOPAT increasing to approximately 1.35 billion US dollars; however, this figure did not reach the 2019 peak level.
- Summary of Trends and Insights
- The data indicates that the company experienced a strong performance in the initial years up to 2019, with increasing profitability as evidenced by both net income and NOPAT. The year 2020 represents a notable inflection point with a severe reduction in profitability, culminating in a net loss. This suggests that external or internal factors during 2020 heavily impacted earnings. Both metrics improved in 2021, reflecting a recovery phase, but the full return to the profitability levels of 2019 has not yet been realized by the end of that year. The persistence of positive NOPAT through the downturn indicates ongoing operational profitability despite overall net losses in 2020.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The financial data reveals notable fluctuations in the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes over the five-year period.
- Provision for income taxes
- This item experienced an overall increase from 242,400 thousand US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 364,300 thousand US dollars in 2018. Subsequently, it decreased to 322,700 thousand US dollars in 2019 and sharply declined further to 176,600 thousand US dollars in 2020. However, it rebounded to 270,200 thousand US dollars in 2021. This pattern indicates volatility with a significant dip in 2020, possibly linked to changes in taxable income or tax regulations, followed by a partial recovery in the final year.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes presented a different trend characterized by a marked decrease from 692,614 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 329,842 thousand US dollars in 2018. After this drop, values rose to 405,411 thousand US dollars in 2019, followed by another decline to 280,171 thousand US dollars in 2020. There was a moderate increase to 319,507 thousand US dollars in 2021. Overall, the data exhibits considerable volatility with no sustained growth or decline, indicating fluctuating cash tax outflows over the years.
In summary, both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes show significant variability throughout the period, with notable decreases in 2020 likely tied to the extraordinary circumstances of that year. The partial rebounds in 2021 suggest a normalization trend, although both metrics remain below their initial high points observed in earlier years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of restructuring liability.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Ecolab shareholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating pattern over the observed periods. Starting at approximately $7.88 billion in 2017, there is a gradual decline until 2019, reaching about $6.93 billion. This is followed by a slight increase in 2020 to approximately $7.11 billion, and a notable rise in 2021 to roughly $9.16 billion. The large increase in 2021 indicates a significant change in the company's leverage or financing activities.
- Total Shareholders' Equity
- Shareholders’ equity shows a general upward trend from 2017 to 2019, rising from around $7.62 billion to approximately $8.69 billion. However, in 2020, there is a sharp decrease to about $6.17 billion, followed by a partial recovery in 2021 to approximately $7.22 billion. The drop in 2020 could reflect significant losses, dividend payments, share repurchases, or other equity-reducing activities during that year.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrates an increase from 2017 to 2019, moving from around $17.39 billion to $18.09 billion. In 2020, there is a decline to approximately $15.60 billion, consistent with the reduction in shareholders' equity and the minor increase in debt. By 2021, invested capital rises again to about $18.43 billion, reaching its highest level in the observed timeframe. This trend suggests active adjustments in the capital structure and investment base through the period.
Cost of Capital
Ecolab Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited a generally declining trend over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. While fluctuations occurred, the ratio consistently remained negative, indicating that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital during this timeframe.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- In 2017, the economic spread ratio was -6.80%. This decreased to -5.46% in 2018, representing a slight improvement. However, the ratio then moved to -5.96% in 2019, followed by a more substantial decline to -7.89% in 2020. The downward trend continued into 2021, with the ratio reaching -7.64%.
The negative economic spread ratio across all observed years suggests a consistent destruction of shareholder value. The increasing negativity from 2017 through 2020 indicates a widening gap between the cost of capital and the returns generated from invested capital. While the ratio experienced a minor positive shift in 2021, it remained negative, signifying that the company did not generate sufficient returns to cover its cost of capital.
- Relationship to Economic Profit
- The consistently negative economic profit values align with the negative economic spread ratios. Economic profit, which is a function of invested capital and the economic spread, was negative throughout the period, reinforcing the conclusion that the company’s investments did not yield returns exceeding their cost. The increasing magnitude of negative economic profit from 2017 to 2021 corresponds with the increasingly negative economic spread ratio.
Invested capital demonstrated some variability. It increased from 2017 to 2019, decreased significantly in 2020, and then increased again in 2021. However, these changes in invested capital did not translate into an improvement in the economic spread ratio, suggesting that the issue lies primarily with the company’s ability to generate returns on its capital, rather than the level of capital employed.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited a consistent decline over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. While economic profit remained negative throughout the observed timeframe, its absolute value increased, contributing to the worsening margin. Net sales demonstrated initial growth, followed by a significant contraction and subsequent partial recovery.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin decreased steadily from -8.55% in 2017 to -11.07% in 2021. This indicates a growing disparity between the company’s economic profit and its net sales. The margin’s negative value consistently signifies that the company’s return on capital employed is less than its cost of capital, resulting in value destruction.
- Net Sales Trend
- Net sales increased from US$13,838,300 thousand in 2017 to US$14,668,200 thousand in 2018, representing a growth of approximately 6.37%. A further increase was observed in 2019, reaching US$14,906,300 thousand. However, 2020 witnessed a substantial decline in net sales to US$11,790,200 thousand, a decrease of approximately 20.87% from the prior year. Net sales partially recovered in 2021, reaching US$12,733,100 thousand, but remained below pre-2020 levels.
- Relationship between Economic Profit and Net Sales
- Despite the initial growth in net sales between 2017 and 2019, the economic profit margin did not improve correspondingly. This suggests that increases in sales were not sufficient to offset rising costs or inadequate returns on capital. The significant drop in net sales in 2020 coincided with a marked deterioration in the economic profit margin, indicating that reduced sales volume exacerbated the existing profitability challenges. The partial recovery in sales during 2021 did not translate into an improved margin, suggesting persistent underlying issues affecting economic profitability.
The consistent negative economic profit margin, coupled with the declining trend, warrants further investigation into the factors driving the company’s cost of capital and its ability to generate returns exceeding those costs. The volatility in net sales also presents a potential area of concern, requiring analysis of the underlying causes and their impact on long-term financial performance.