Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
The company's short-term operating activity between 2019 and 2023 is characterized by a period of operational deceleration from 2020 through 2022, followed by a notable recovery in efficiency during 2023. The overall trend indicates a return toward pre-2020 baseline performance levels, accompanied by a significant improvement in working capital utilization.
- Inventory Management Efficiency
- Inventory turnover experienced a gradual decline from 5.05 in 2019 to a low of 3.81 in 2022, reflecting a slowing of inventory movement. This is mirrored by the average inventory processing period, which extended from 72 days to 96 days over the same period. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2023, with the turnover ratio increasing to 4.55 and the processing period shortening to 80 days, signaling improved inventory liquidation and management.
- Receivables and Payables Dynamics
- The receivables turnover ratio showed volatility, dropping to 5.19 in 2020 before stabilizing around 6.10 by 2023. The average receivable collection period peaked at 70 days in 2020 and 68 days in 2022, but returned to a more efficient 60 days by the end of 2023. Similarly, the payables turnover and payment period fluctuated, with the payment period peaking at 73 days in 2022. The close tracking between collection and payment periods suggests a strategic alignment of cash outflows with inflows to manage liquidity.
- Working Capital Utilization
- A significant upward trend is observed in the working capital turnover ratio. After a sharp decline from 7.54 in 2019 to 3.56 in 2020, the ratio grew aggressively to 14.84 by 2023. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's ability to generate revenue relative to its invested working capital, reflecting highly optimized short-term asset deployment in the final year of the analyzed period.
- Cash Conversion Cycle and Operating Cycle
- The operating cycle lengthened from 129 days in 2019 to a peak of 164 days in 2022, driven primarily by slower inventory turnover. Consequently, the cash conversion cycle expanded from 76 days to 91 days during this window. By 2023, both metrics contracted significantly, with the operating cycle dropping to 140 days and the cash conversion cycle reducing to 80 days. This compression suggests a regained efficiency in converting resource inputs into cash flows.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Inventory Turnover
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of sales | 25,816) | 21,355) | 18,326) | 14,917) | 17,591) | |
| Inventories | 5,677) | 5,603) | 4,355) | 3,425) | 3,486) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Inventory turnover1 | 4.55 | 3.81 | 4.21 | 4.36 | 5.05 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.75 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 2.58 | 2.54 | 2.53 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 3.95 | 4.04 | 4.48 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 3.05 | 3.19 | 3.40 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 3.72 | 4.04 | 4.29 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 18.87 | 18.68 | 19.45 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 4.83 | 5.03 | 5.65 | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 2.30 | 2.28 | 2.28 | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 4.23 | 4.28 | 4.03 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventories
= 25,816 ÷ 5,677 = 4.55
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2019 and 2023, inventory management efficiency experienced a period of decline followed by a recovery in the final year. While the cost of sales showed strong growth toward the end of the period, the initial pace of inventory accumulation outstripped sales growth, which pressured the turnover rate.
- Cost of Sales Trends
- The cost of sales exhibited a volatile but generally ascending trajectory. Following a contraction in 2020 to 14,917 million US$, there was a consistent and accelerating increase over the subsequent three years, peaking at 25,816 million US$ by the end of 2023.
- Inventory Accumulation
- Inventory levels remained relatively stable between 2019 and 2020 but entered a phase of rapid expansion from 2021 through 2022, increasing from 4,355 million US$ to 5,603 million US$. This growth trend plateaued in 2023, with the value ending at 5,677 million US$.
- Inventory Turnover Efficiency
- The inventory turnover ratio followed a U-shaped pattern, declining from 5.05 in 2019 to a low of 3.81 in 2022. This downward trend indicates a reduction in the frequency of inventory replacement, likely driven by the disproportionate increase in inventory holdings relative to sales during those years. A significant recovery was observed in 2023, as the ratio rose to 4.55. This improvement is a direct result of a substantial increase in the cost of sales while inventory levels remained nearly constant, signaling a return toward higher operational efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Receivables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net sales | 34,065) | 28,074) | 24,021) | 19,811) | 23,571) | |
| Accounts and notes receivable, net | 5,583) | 5,202) | 3,990) | 3,820) | 3,670) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Receivables turnover1 | 6.10 | 5.40 | 6.02 | 5.19 | 6.42 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 29.37 | 26.46 | 23.58 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 6.86 | 6.39 | 5.68 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 5.18 | 5.09 | 5.95 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 4.17 | 4.09 | 4.55 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 4.87 | 4.77 | 5.04 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 31.69 | 26.34 | 34.15 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 6.36 | 7.36 | 6.66 | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 7.68 | 7.36 | 7.57 | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 8.61 | 8.17 | 7.76 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Accounts and notes receivable, net
= 34,065 ÷ 5,583 = 6.10
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Net sales experienced a temporary contraction in 2020 but entered a period of sustained growth thereafter, increasing from 19,811 million US$ in 2020 to 34,065 million US$ by the end of 2023. During the same five-year period, accounts and notes receivable, net, demonstrated a consistent upward trend, rising from 3,670 million US$ in 2019 to 5,583 million US$ in 2023, indicating a growth in the company's credit extension to customers.
- Receivables Turnover Fluctuations
- The receivables turnover ratio exhibited volatility over the analyzed period. A significant decrease was observed in 2020, where the ratio fell to 5.19, reflecting the impact of declining sales relative to the growth in receivables. The ratio recovered to 6.02 in 2021, dipped again to 5.40 in 2022, and ultimately rose to 6.10 by the end of 2023.
- Analysis of Collection Efficiency
- The data indicates that while the total balance of receivables has increased by approximately 52% since 2019, the turnover ratio has remained within a relatively stable range. The rebound to 6.10 in 2023 suggests that the increase in sales volume is currently being matched by efficient collection processes, preventing the growth in receivables from adversely impacting the turnover rate in the most recent fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Payables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of sales | 25,816) | 21,355) | 18,326) | 14,917) | 17,591) | |
| Accounts payable, principally trade | 4,260) | 4,252) | 3,021) | 2,820) | 2,534) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Payables turnover1 | 6.06 | 5.02 | 6.07 | 5.29 | 6.94 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 5.86 | 6.18 | 6.40 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 5.41 | 4.76 | 4.36 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 4.39 | 4.51 | 4.75 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 3.27 | 2.98 | 3.32 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 3.36 | 3.53 | 3.40 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 25.56 | 27.25 | 74.34 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 5.31 | 5.40 | 5.93 | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 5.42 | 5.21 | 5.60 | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 8.07 | 7.83 | 7.81 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Accounts payable, principally trade
= 25,816 ÷ 4,260 = 6.06
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of short-term operating activity from 2019 to 2023 reveals fluctuating efficiency in the management of supplier obligations. While there was a general increase in the scale of operations, the velocity of payments to trade creditors shifted in response to changes in both cost of sales and the total balance of accounts payable.
- Cost of Sales Evolution
- The cost of sales demonstrated a volatile but overall upward trajectory. After a contraction in 2020 to 14,917 million USD, the figure grew steadily, peaking at 25,816 million USD by December 31, 2023. This expansion indicates a significant increase in the volume of goods and materials processed through the operational cycle over the five-year period.
- Accounts Payable Trends
- Accounts payable, principally trade, showed a consistent upward trend, increasing from 2,534 million USD in 2019 to 4,260 million USD in 2023. A particularly sharp increase is observed between 2021 and 2022, where balances rose from 3,021 million USD to 4,252 million USD, suggesting either an expansion of supplier credit terms or a strategic increase in procurement.
- Payables Turnover Ratio Interpretation
- The payables turnover ratio exhibited non-linear movement, starting at 6.94 in 2019 and reaching a minimum of 5.02 in 2022. The declines observed in 2020 and 2022 indicate a slowing of the payment cycle, meaning supplier obligations were settled less frequently. However, the ratio rebounded to 6.06 in 2023, signaling a return to a higher frequency of payment and a normalization of the relationship between operational costs and outstanding trade liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Working Capital Turnover
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Current assets | 15,198) | 14,451) | 12,309) | 11,897) | 9,387) | |
| Less: Current liabilities | 12,903) | 11,421) | 7,084) | 6,335) | 6,260) | |
| Working capital | 2,295) | 3,030) | 5,225) | 5,562) | 3,127) | |
| Net sales | 34,065) | 28,074) | 24,021) | 19,811) | 23,571) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Working capital turnover1 | 14.84 | 9.27 | 4.60 | 3.56 | 7.54 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 5.78 | 3.42 | 2.34 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 5.23 | 4.62 | 3.54 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 5.91 | 8.70 | 65.65 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 7.24 | 7.93 | 4.94 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 7.39 | 7.03 | 5.86 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 18.85 | 12.93 | 11.52 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 41.62 | 20.15 | 9.75 | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 8.26 | 6.79 | 5.01 | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 13.27 | 10.34 | 6.90 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 34,065 ÷ 2,295 = 14.84
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of operational activity from 2019 to 2023 indicates a significant enhancement in the efficiency of working capital utilization. After a sharp decline in turnover efficiency during 2020, there is a consistent and accelerating upward trajectory in the ratio, culminating in a five-year peak by the end of 2023.
- Net Sales Performance
- Revenue experienced a temporary contraction in 2020, falling to 19,811 million US dollars. However, a sustained growth pattern emerged thereafter, with sales increasing steadily to reach 34,065 million US dollars by December 31, 2023. This represents a robust recovery and expansion of top-line activity over the observed period.
- Working Capital Dynamics
- Working capital peaked in 2020 at 5,562 million US dollars, nearly doubling the 2019 level. From 2021 onward, a consistent downward trend is observed, with the balance reducing to 2,295 million US dollars in 2023. This reduction suggests a strategic tightening of short-term liquidity or a more optimized management of current assets and liabilities.
- Working Capital Turnover Evolution
- The turnover ratio reflects the combined effect of rising sales and falling working capital. The ratio dropped to 3.56 in 2020, coinciding with the period of lowest sales and highest working capital. Subsequently, the ratio improved sharply, rising to 4.60 in 2021, 9.27 in 2022, and 14.84 in 2023. The final value indicates a substantial increase in the volume of sales generated per unit of working capital invested.
The divergence between the growth in net sales and the reduction in working capital suggests a transition toward a lean operating model. The rapid escalation of the turnover ratio from 2021 to 2023 demonstrates an optimized conversion of short-term resources into revenue, significantly increasing operational velocity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Inventory Processing Period
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Inventory turnover | 4.55 | 3.81 | 4.21 | 4.36 | 5.05 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | 80 | 96 | 87 | 84 | 72 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 415 | 452 | 486 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 141 | 144 | 144 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 92 | 90 | 82 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 120 | 114 | 107 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 98 | 90 | 85 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19 | 20 | 19 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 76 | 73 | 65 | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 159 | 160 | 160 | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 86 | 85 | 91 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 4.55 = 80
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of inventory activity between 2019 and 2023 reveals a distinct cyclical pattern in operational efficiency. A progressive decline in inventory movement was observed from 2019 through 2022, followed by a significant recovery in 2023.
- Inventory Turnover Trends
- The inventory turnover ratio experienced a consistent downward trajectory for four consecutive years, decreasing from 5.05 in 2019 to a low of 3.81 in 2022. This decline suggests a reduction in the frequency with which inventory was replaced during this period. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2023, with the ratio increasing to 4.55, indicating a marked improvement in the velocity of inventory movement.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- Mirroring the turnover trends, the average inventory processing period showed a steady increase from 72 days in 2019 to a peak of 96 days in 2022. This expansion of 24 days represents a slowing of the operational cycle and a longer duration of capital tied up in inventory. In 2023, this period contracted significantly to 80 days, reflecting a more efficient liquidation of stock.
- Operational Efficiency Insights
- The inverse correlation between the turnover ratio and the processing period confirms a period of operational strain peaking in 2022. The subsequent improvement in 2023 suggests a successful optimization of inventory management practices or a stronger alignment between production and market demand, bringing the processing period closer to the baseline efficiency levels observed at the start of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Receivable Collection Period
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Receivables turnover | 6.10 | 5.40 | 6.02 | 5.19 | 6.42 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | 60 | 68 | 61 | 70 | 57 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 12 | 14 | 15 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 53 | 57 | 64 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 70 | 72 | 61 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 87 | 89 | 80 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 75 | 77 | 72 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 12 | 14 | 11 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 57 | 50 | 55 | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 48 | 50 | 48 | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 42 | 45 | 47 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 6.10 = 60
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term activity ratios indicates a period of fluctuation in the efficiency of credit and collection processes between 2019 and 2023. There is a consistent inverse correlation between the receivables turnover ratio and the average collection period, reflecting periodic shifts in the speed at which accounts receivable are converted into cash.
- Receivables Turnover Trends
- The receivables turnover ratio experienced a decline from a high of 6.42 in 2019 to its lowest point of 5.19 in 2020. While a recovery occurred in 2021 reaching 6.02, a subsequent decline to 5.40 was observed in 2022. The period concluded with an upward trend, returning to 6.10 by December 31, 2023, suggesting a restoration of collection efficiency toward the initial 2019 levels.
- Average Receivable Collection Period Trends
- The time required to collect outstanding receivables fluctuated between a minimum of 57 days in 2019 and a maximum of 70 days in 2020. Following the 2020 peak, the collection period decreased to 61 days in 2021, rose again to 68 days in 2022, and finally decreased to 60 days in 2023. This volatility suggests periodic challenges in maintaining a consistent collection cycle over the five-year window.
- Comparative Efficiency Analysis
- The most significant deterioration in operating activity occurred in 2020, where the increase in the collection period to 70 days aligned with the lowest observed turnover ratio. The recovery observed in 2023 indicates that the company has largely mitigated the delays experienced in 2020 and 2022, effectively bringing the collection cycle back to a range comparable to the 2019 baseline.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Cycle
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 80 | 96 | 87 | 84 | 72 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 60 | 68 | 61 | 70 | 57 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Operating cycle1 | 140 | 164 | 148 | 154 | 129 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 427 | 466 | 501 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 194 | 201 | 208 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 162 | 162 | 143 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 207 | 203 | 187 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 173 | 167 | 157 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 31 | 34 | 30 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 133 | 123 | 120 | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 207 | 210 | 208 | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 128 | 130 | 138 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 80 + 60 = 140
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operating cycle exhibited a general upward trend between 2019 and 2022, followed by a notable reduction in duration by the end of 2023. This fluctuation indicates a period of decreased operational efficiency in working capital management that was partially reversed in the most recent fiscal year.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- A steady increase in the time required to process inventory was observed from 2019, when the period was 72 days, through 2022, where it reached a peak of 96 days. This represents a significant expansion in the time inventory is held before being sold. However, a correction occurred in 2023, with the period decreasing to 80 days, indicating a recovery in inventory turnover efficiency.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period demonstrated volatility throughout the analyzed timeframe. After rising from 57 days in 2019 to a peak of 70 days in 2020, the metric fluctuated between 61 and 68 days over the subsequent years. By 2023, the collection period decreased to 60 days, suggesting a stabilization in the effectiveness of credit and collection processes.
- Operating Cycle
- The total operating cycle mirrored the trends of its underlying components, peaking at 164 days in 2022. The expansion from 129 days in 2019 to 164 days in 2022 reflects a deceleration in the cash-to-cash conversion process. The reduction to 140 days in 2023 indicates an improvement in overall operational velocity, although the cycle remains longer than the 2019 baseline.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Payables Payment Period
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Payables turnover | 6.06 | 5.02 | 6.07 | 5.29 | 6.94 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average payables payment period1 | 60 | 73 | 60 | 69 | 53 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 62 | 59 | 57 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 67 | 77 | 84 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 83 | 81 | 77 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 112 | 123 | 110 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 109 | 103 | 107 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 14 | 13 | 5 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 69 | 68 | 62 | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 67 | 70 | 65 | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 45 | 47 | 47 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 6.06 = 60
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a cyclical pattern in the management of accounts payable between 2019 and 2023. Fluctuations in both the payables turnover ratio and the average payment period indicate periodic adjustments in the timing of supplier settlements and the management of working capital.
- Payables Turnover Ratio
- The turnover ratio exhibited significant volatility over the observed period. From a high of 6.94 in 2019, the ratio declined to 5.29 in 2020, followed by a recovery to 6.07 in 2021. A further decline occurred in 2022, reaching a five-year low of 5.02, before returning to 6.06 in 2023. This variance suggests inconsistent velocity in the settlement of short-term liabilities.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- An inverse correlation is observed between the turnover ratio and the average payment period. The period for settling payables increased from 53 days in 2019 to 69 days in 2020, then contracted to 60 days in 2021. The payment duration peaked at 73 days in 2022, representing the longest delay in supplier payments within the data set, before receding to 60 days in 2023.
- Liquidity and Working Capital Insights
- The extensions of the payment period in 2020 and 2022 indicate phases where obligations were held longer, effectively increasing the available cash flow for operations. The return to a 60-day payment period and a 6.06 turnover ratio in 2023 suggests a stabilization of credit terms and a return to payment behaviors consistent with 2021 levels.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Conversion Cycle
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 80 | 96 | 87 | 84 | 72 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 60 | 68 | 61 | 70 | 57 | |
| Average payables payment period | 60 | 73 | 60 | 69 | 53 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | 80 | 91 | 88 | 85 | 76 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 365 | 407 | 444 | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 127 | 124 | 124 | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 79 | 81 | 66 | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 95 | 80 | 77 | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 64 | 64 | 50 | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 17 | 21 | 25 | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 64 | 55 | 58 | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 140 | 140 | 143 | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 83 | 83 | 91 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 2023 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 80 + 60 – 60 = 80
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The cash conversion cycle exhibited a gradual expansion between 2019 and 2022, followed by a notable contraction in 2023. This progression indicates a period of decreasing liquidity efficiency that was reversed in the most recent fiscal year.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- A steady increase was observed from 72 days in 2019 to a peak of 96 days in 2022. This upward trajectory suggests a slowdown in inventory turnover during this interval. A significant improvement occurred in 2023, with the period dropping to 80 days, indicating more efficient movement of goods and reduced capital tied up in stock.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- Collection times remained volatile, peaking at 70 days in 2020 and 68 days in 2022. The period concluded at 60 days in 2023, reflecting a return toward the baseline established in 2019 (57 days), which suggests a stabilization in credit management and collection efficiency.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The payment period fluctuated throughout the period, reaching a high of 73 days in 2022. This peak indicates an increase in the duration the company takes to settle obligations with suppliers, effectively using accounts payable as a source of short-term financing. This period retracted to 60 days in 2023, aligning with the contraction in the receivable collection period.
- Cash Conversion Cycle
- The overall cycle lengthened from 76 days in 2019 to 91 days in 2022, driven primarily by the accumulation of inventory. The subsequent decline to 80 days in 2023 indicates an optimization of working capital, reducing the total time required to convert resource inputs into cash flows.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?