Halliburton Co. (NYSE:HAL)

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

Area Asset Turnover: North America

Halliburton Co.; North America; area asset turnover calculation

	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015	Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue	14,431)	11,564)	6,770)	10,856)	17,698)
Net property, plant and equipment	5,672)	4,922)	4,431)	5,745)	6,057)
Area Activity Ratio
Area asset turnover¹	2.54	2.35	1.53	1.89	2.92

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

¹ 2018 Calculation
Area asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Net property, plant and equipment
= 14,431 ÷ 5,672 = 2.54

The North American operational performance between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by a significant contraction in revenue and asset efficiency, followed by a robust recovery phase starting in 2017.

Revenue Trends: A severe downward trend in revenue is observed from 2014 to 2016, where figures dropped from 17,698 million USD to a low of 6,770 million USD. This period of contraction was followed by a strong recovery, with revenue increasing to 11,564 million USD in 2017 and reaching 14,431 million USD by December 31, 2018.
Net Property, Plant, and Equipment (PP&E) Management: Net PP&E experienced a more moderate decline than revenue, falling from 6,057 million USD in 2014 to 4,431 million USD in 2016. Following this low point, fixed assets were gradually expanded, rising to 4,922 million USD in 2017 and 5,672 million USD in 2018, indicating a realignment of capacity to support increasing demand.
Area Asset Turnover Efficiency: The area asset turnover ratio exhibited a V-shaped trajectory. The ratio declined from 2.92 in 2014 to 1.53 in 2016, indicating that revenue diminished at a much faster rate than the reduction in fixed assets, leading to decreased operational efficiency. However, efficiency improved markedly in the subsequent two years, with the ratio climbing to 2.35 in 2017 and 2.54 in 2018. This suggests that the recovery in revenue significantly outpaced the reinvestment in net PP&E, resulting in higher productivity per unit of asset.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

Area Asset Turnover: Latin America

Halliburton Co.; Latin America; area asset turnover calculation

	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015	Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue	2,065)	2,116)	1,860)	3,149)	3,875)
Net property, plant and equipment	974)	945)	1,068)	1,450)	1,406)
Area Activity Ratio
Area asset turnover¹	2.12	2.24	1.74	2.17	2.76

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

¹ 2018 Calculation
Area asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Net property, plant and equipment
= 2,065 ÷ 974 = 2.12

Between 2014 and 2018, the Latin American operations experienced significant volatility in revenue generation and asset utilization. A pronounced contraction in revenue occurred between 2014 and 2016, where figures dropped from US$ 3,875 million to US$ 1,860 million, representing a substantial decline in regional performance. This trend shifted toward stabilization in 2017 and 2018, with revenue remaining near the US$ 2,100 million mark.

Revenue Performance: A sharp downward trajectory is observed from 2014 through 2016. Although a modest recovery occurred in 2017 with revenue reaching US$ 2,116 million, the growth was not sustained, as 2018 saw a slight decrease to US$ 2,065 million.
Net Property, Plant, and Equipment (PP&E) Trends: The asset base remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2015, peaking at US$ 1,450 million. Subsequently, a consistent reduction in net PP&E was observed, reaching a low of US$ 945 million in 2017. A marginal increase to US$ 974 million occurred in 2018, suggesting a period of asset consolidation and realignment following the initial revenue collapse.
Area Asset Turnover Efficiency: The asset turnover ratio declined from 2.76 in 2014 to a low of 1.74 in 2016, indicating that the reduction in revenue far outpaced the reduction in the asset base during this period. A recovery in efficiency was noted in 2017, with the ratio rising to 2.24, primarily driven by the simultaneous increase in revenue and the continued decrease in net PP&E. By 2018, the ratio settled at 2.12, reflecting an operational efficiency level that is higher than the 2016 trough but remains significantly below 2014 peaks.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

Area Asset Turnover: Europe/Africa/CIS

Halliburton Co.; Europe/Africa/CIS; area asset turnover calculation

	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015	Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue	2,945)	2,781)	2,993)	4,175)	5,490)
Net property, plant and equipment	938)	1,098)	1,253)	1,594)	1,832)
Area Activity Ratio
Area asset turnover¹	3.14	2.53	2.39	2.62	3.00

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

¹ 2018 Calculation
Area asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Net property, plant and equipment
= 2,945 ÷ 938 = 3.14

Between 2014 and 2018, the Europe/Africa/CIS region experienced a period of significant revenue volatility accompanied by a steady contraction of the fixed asset base. While revenue levels faced a sharp decline in the early part of the period, the efficiency of asset utilization followed a U-shaped trajectory, ultimately recovering to exceed 2014 levels by the end of the analyzed timeframe.

Revenue Performance: A substantial downward trend in revenue is observed from 2014 to 2017, with figures falling from 5,490 million US$ to a low of 2,781 million US$. This represents a nearly 50% decrease in top-line performance over three years. A modest recovery occurred in 2018, as revenue rose to 2,945 million US$, indicating a stabilization of operations in these geographic markets.
Net Property, Plant and Equipment (PP&E) Trends: The net PP&E showed a consistent and uninterrupted year-over-year decline throughout the entire period. Assets were reduced from 1,832 million US$ in 2014 to 938 million US$ in 2018. This sustained reduction suggests a strategic effort to scale down the physical asset base in response to declining market demand and to lower the overhead associated with fixed assets.
Area Asset Turnover Analysis: The area asset turnover ratio initially decreased from 3.00 in 2014 to 2.39 in 2016, reflecting a period where revenue declined more rapidly than the company could divest or depreciate its assets. However, the ratio improved in 2017 (2.53) and peaked in 2018 at 3.14. This improvement in turnover is primarily driven by the continued aggressive reduction of the PP&E base, which eventually outpaced the revenue decline and synchronized with the slight revenue growth in 2018, thereby enhancing overall asset efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

Area Asset Turnover: Middle East/Asia

Halliburton Co.; Middle East/Asia; area asset turnover calculation

	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015	Dec 31, 2014
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue	4,554)	4,159)	4,264)	5,453)	5,807)
Net property, plant and equipment	1,377)	1,556)	1,780)	2,122)	3,180)
Area Activity Ratio
Area asset turnover¹	3.31	2.67	2.40	2.57	1.83

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

¹ 2018 Calculation
Area asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Net property, plant and equipment
= 4,554 ÷ 1,377 = 3.31

Between 2014 and 2018, the Middle East/Asia geographic segment exhibited a significant restructuring of its asset base relative to its revenue generation, resulting in a marked increase in operational efficiency as measured by asset turnover.

Revenue Trends: Revenue experienced an overall decline from a peak of 5,807 million US$ in 2014 to a low of 4,159 million US$ in 2017. This represented a contraction of approximately 28.4% over the four-year period. However, a recovery trend emerged in 2018, with revenue increasing to 4,554 million US$.
Net Property, Plant, and Equipment (PPE): A consistent and aggressive downward trend is observed in the net PPE. The asset base was reduced from 3,180 million US$ in 2014 to 1,377 million US$ by 2018. This continuous reduction indicates a significant divestment or depreciation of physical assets, totaling a decrease of roughly 56.7% over the analyzed period.
Area Asset Turnover Efficiency: The area asset turnover ratio improved substantially, rising from 1.83 in 2014 to 3.31 in 2018. While revenue declined, the pace of asset reduction significantly outstripped the decline in sales. This divergence resulted in a higher ratio, suggesting that the company became more efficient at generating revenue from its remaining fixed assets. The most notable jump occurred between 2014 and 2015, where the ratio shifted from 1.83 to 2.57, and again in 2018, where it reached its period peak.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

Halliburton Co., revenue by geographic area

US$ in millions

	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015	Dec 31, 2014
North America	14,431)	11,564)	6,770)	10,856)	17,698)
Latin America	2,065)	2,116)	1,860)	3,149)	3,875)
Europe/Africa/CIS	2,945)	2,781)	2,993)	4,175)	5,490)
Middle East/Asia	4,554)	4,159)	4,264)	5,453)	5,807)
Total	23,995)	20,620)	15,887)	23,633)	32,870)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

Total revenue exhibited a significant contraction between 2014 and 2016, falling from US$ 32,870 million to a low of US$ 15,887 million. A recovery phase followed, with revenues increasing to US$ 20,620 million in 2017 and reaching US$ 23,995 million by December 31, 2018. Despite the upward trend in the final two years, the total revenue remained approximately 27% below 2014 levels.

North American Market Volatility: North America served as the primary driver for both the overall decline and subsequent recovery. Revenue in this region plummeted from US$ 17,698 million in 2014 to US$ 6,770 million in 2016, representing a decrease of approximately 61.7%. A strong rebound occurred thereafter, with revenue climbing to US$ 14,431 million by 2018.
Latin American Revenue Erosion: The Latin American segment experienced a substantial reduction in revenue, dropping from US$ 3,875 million in 2014 to US$ 1,860 million in 2016. Unlike the North American market, this region demonstrated limited recovery, remaining relatively stagnant between 2017 and 2018 at approximately US$ 2.1 billion.
Europe, Africa, and CIS Performance: A consistent downward trend was observed in the Europe/Africa/CIS region from 2014 through 2017. Revenue declined from US$ 5,490 million to US$ 2,781 million during this period. A slight recovery was noted in 2018, with revenue rising marginally to US$ 2,945 million.
Middle East and Asia Resilience: The Middle East/Asia region displayed the highest level of relative stability among all geographic areas. Although revenue decreased from US$ 5,807 million in 2014 to US$ 4,159 million in 2017, the decline was less severe than in other regions. By 2018, revenue in this segment had recovered to US$ 4,554 million.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

Halliburton Co., net property, plant and equipment by geographic area

US$ in millions

	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015	Dec 31, 2014
North America	5,672)	4,922)	4,431)	5,745)	6,057)
Latin America	974)	945)	1,068)	1,450)	1,406)
Europe/Africa/CIS	938)	1,098)	1,253)	1,594)	1,832)
Middle East/Asia	1,377)	1,556)	1,780)	2,122)	3,180)
Total	8,961)	8,521)	8,532)	10,911)	12,475)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).

Total net property, plant and equipment experienced a significant overall contraction between 2014 and 2018, declining from US$ 12,475 million to US$ 8,961 million. The most substantial reduction occurred between 2014 and 2016, after which asset levels stabilized and showed a slight recovery in the final year of the period.

North American Asset Trends: North America remained the largest geographic segment throughout the period. A V-shaped trend is observed, with net property, plant and equipment falling from US$ 6,057 million in 2014 to a low of US$ 4,431 million in 2016, before recovering to US$ 5,672 million by December 31, 2018.
Middle East and Asia Contraction: The Middle East/Asia region exhibited the most aggressive and consistent decline in asset value. Net property, plant and equipment dropped from US$ 3,180 million in 2014 to US$ 1,377 million in 2018, representing a reduction of approximately 56.7% over the five-year duration.
European, African, and CIS Market Depreciation: A steady downward trajectory is evident in the Europe/Africa/CIS region. Assets decreased annually from US$ 1,832 million in 2014 to US$ 938 million in 2018, indicating a continuous reduction in the net book value of equipment and property in these markets.
Latin American Asset Performance: Net property, plant and equipment in Latin America remained relatively stable in 2015 at US$ 1,450 million but subsequently declined to US$ 945 million by 2017. A marginal increase to US$ 974 million was recorded in 2018, suggesting a stabilization of asset levels in this region.

The divergence in regional trends indicates a strategic shift or differing economic pressures, as the North American market showed signs of reinvestment after 2016, while all other international segments experienced a sustained decrease in net asset values.

AI Ask an analyst for more