Stock Analysis on Net

Ross Stores Inc. (NASDAQ:ROST)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since December 7, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Ross Stores Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period between January 28, 2017, and January 29, 2022, demonstrates a fluctuating pattern in economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) generally increased from 2017 to 2020, while invested capital consistently rose throughout the entire period. The cost of capital exhibited a slight, overall decreasing trend. However, economic profit itself experienced significant variation, peaking in 2020 before a substantial decline in 2021, followed by a recovery in 2022.

NOPAT Trend
Net operating profit after taxes increased from US$1,203,081 thousand in 2017 to US$1,766,422 thousand in 2020, representing substantial growth. A significant decrease was observed in 2021, with NOPAT falling to US$209,948 thousand, before rebounding to US$1,877,216 thousand in 2022. This suggests a period of operational disruption in 2021 followed by a recovery.
Cost of Capital Trend
The cost of capital began at 16.54% in 2017 and experienced minor fluctuations, reaching 16.82% in 2019. It then decreased to 16.33% in 2021 and further to 15.95% in 2022. This indicates a gradual reduction in the required rate of return for the company’s investments.
Invested Capital Trend
Invested capital consistently increased throughout the observed period, rising from US$6,022,627 thousand in 2017 to US$9,245,498 thousand in 2022. This demonstrates a continuous expansion of the company’s asset base and investment in operations.
Economic Profit Analysis
Economic profit showed a positive trend from 2017 to 2020, increasing from US$206,930 thousand to US$631,097 thousand. The substantial decrease to a negative US$1,222,373 thousand in 2021 indicates that the return on invested capital was less than the cost of capital during that year. The recovery to US$402,989 thousand in 2022 suggests improved performance relative to the cost of capital, but remains below the peak levels observed in prior years. The 2021 decline in economic profit appears to be driven by the significant drop in NOPAT, despite the continued increase in invested capital.

The interplay between NOPAT, cost of capital, and invested capital significantly influenced economic profit. While invested capital consistently grew, the fluctuations in NOPAT and the decreasing cost of capital created a dynamic pattern in economic profit, highlighting the importance of maintaining profitability relative to the cost of funding investments.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Ross Stores Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Net earnings
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents2
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability3
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense4
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes5
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income6
Investment income, after taxes7
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.

3 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

4 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.

6 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data reveals the following trends over the six-year period:

Net Earnings
Net earnings generally increased from 2017 through 2020, rising from approximately 1,117,654 thousand US dollars to 1,660,928 thousand US dollars. However, in 2021 there was a significant decline to 85,382 thousand US dollars, which represents a substantial drop. In 2022, net earnings recovered strongly to 1,722,589 thousand US dollars, exceeding prior peak levels.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT followed a similar upward trend initially, climbing steadily from 1,203,081 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 1,766,422 thousand US dollars in 2020. In 2021, there was a sharp decrease to 209,948 thousand US dollars, mirroring the decline seen in net earnings. In 2022, NOPAT rebounded to 1,877,216 thousand US dollars, representing the highest value recorded during the period.

The data reflects strong growth from 2017 to 2020 in both net earnings and NOPAT. The pronounced dip in 2021 could indicate an extraordinary circumstance or operational disruption impacting profitability. The swift recovery in 2022 suggests that the company regained operational efficiency and profitability following the 2021 downturn. Overall, despite the temporary contraction, the longer-term trend is one of increasing profitability.


Cash Operating Taxes

Ross Stores Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes over the six-year period ending in early 2022. A detailed examination of the trends is as follows:

Provision for Income Taxes
Beginning with a value of approximately $668.5 million in early 2017, the provision for income taxes remains relatively stable through 2018 at around $678 million. However, it experiences a notable decline in 2019 to about $463.4 million and maintains a similar level in 2020 with approximately $503.4 million. A remarkable drop occurs in 2021, with the provision plummeting to roughly $20.9 million, before rebounding sharply in 2022 to approximately $535.9 million. This inconsistency suggests potential variations in taxable income, adjustments in tax strategy, or the impact of extraordinary items during the observed timeframe.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes start at approximately $727.9 million in early 2017 and increase moderately to about $761.2 million in 2018. Similar to the provision for income taxes, cash operating taxes show a marked decline in 2019, dropping to around $457.5 million, and a slight further decrease in 2020 to approximately $490.9 million. The value again dramatically decreases in 2021 to approximately $89.2 million, followed by a rise in 2022 to about $557.1 million. This pattern aligns with the trends seen in the provision for income taxes, indicating consistent fluctuations in actual tax payments, which could be influenced by changes in earnings, tax regulation modifications, or cash flow management strategies.

Overall, both tax-related items exhibit a pronounced dip in 2021 amid general declines during 2019 and 2020, followed by recovery in 2022. The significant reduction in 2021 for both metrics merits further investigation to understand the underlying causes, which might include one-time tax benefits, changes in corporate earnings, or legislative impacts.


Invested Capital

Ross Stores Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Equity equivalents3
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax4
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction-in-progress5
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

5 Subtraction of construction-in-progress.


Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total reported debt and leases showed a generally increasing trend from 2017 through 2019, rising from approximately $3.22 billion to $3.63 billion. In 2020, this leveled off slightly to around $3.49 billion before experiencing a significant surge in 2021 to $5.73 billion, followed by a slight decrease to $5.62 billion in 2022. This indicates a notable increase in leverage starting in 2021.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders' equity increased steadily from $2.75 billion in 2017 to approximately $3.36 billion in 2020, reflecting consistent growth over these years. There was a slight decline in 2021 to $3.29 billion, which was followed by a substantial increase to $4.06 billion in 2022. Overall, equity growth has been positive with a dip in 2021, possibly influenced by broader financial adjustments during that period.
Invested Capital
Invested capital closely followed a growth pattern from 2017 to 2019, rising from $6.02 billion to about $6.88 billion, with a minor dip in 2020 to $6.81 billion. There was a sharp increase in 2021 to $8.77 billion and a further rise to $9.25 billion in 2022. This demonstrates an overall expansion in the capital base, particularly pronounced from 2021 onwards, aligning with the increased debt levels.

Cost of Capital

Ross Stores Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 34.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 34.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Ross Stores Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio demonstrates a generally positive trend from 2017 to 2020, followed by a significant decline in 2021, and a partial recovery in 2022. This movement correlates with fluctuations in economic profit and invested capital over the same period.

Economic Spread Ratio Trend
The economic spread ratio increased steadily from 3.44% in 2017 to 9.27% in 2020, indicating an improving ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital. However, the ratio experienced a substantial decrease to -13.94% in 2021. A subsequent increase to 4.36% in 2022 suggests a partial rebound, though remaining below pre-2021 levels.

The observed fluctuations in the economic spread ratio are closely linked to the behavior of economic profit. The substantial negative value in 2021 for economic profit directly resulted in the negative economic spread ratio for that year. The recovery in 2022 is attributable to a positive economic profit figure.

Invested Capital and Economic Spread
Invested capital consistently increased throughout the period, from US$6,022,627 thousand in 2017 to US$9,245,498 thousand in 2022. Despite this growth in invested capital, the economic spread ratio was able to improve until 2020, suggesting efficient capital allocation during those years. The inability of increased economic profit in 2022 to fully offset the larger invested capital base resulted in a lower economic spread ratio compared to 2017-2020.

The significant drop in 2021 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying factors contributing to the negative economic profit. While the 2022 recovery is positive, the economic spread ratio remains below its peak values from 2019 and 2020, indicating that the company’s ability to generate returns above its cost of capital has not fully recovered.


Economic Profit Margin

Ross Stores Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited a generally positive trend from 2017 to 2020, followed by a significant decline in 2021 and a partial recovery in 2022. This movement correlates with fluctuations in economic profit and sales revenue over the same period.

Economic Profit Margin Trend
The economic profit margin increased from 1.61% in 2017 to 3.93% in 2020, indicating improving profitability relative to the cost of capital. This suggests the company was increasingly generating value for its investors during this timeframe. However, in 2021, the margin experienced a substantial decrease to -9.75%, signifying a significant destruction of economic value. A subsequent increase to 2.13% in 2022 indicates a partial recovery, but the margin remained below pre-2021 levels.
Relationship to Economic Profit
The economic profit margin’s trajectory closely mirrors that of economic profit. The consistent growth in economic profit from $206,930 thousand in 2017 to $631,097 thousand in 2020 directly contributed to the rising margin. The dramatic decline in economic profit to -$1,222,373 thousand in 2021 resulted in the negative margin. The return to positive economic profit of $402,989 thousand in 2022 drove the margin back into positive territory.
Relationship to Sales
Sales revenue generally increased from $12,866,757 thousand in 2017 to $18,916,244 thousand in 2022, with a notable exception in 2021 where sales decreased to $12,531,565 thousand. While increasing sales typically support higher economic profit, the 2021 experience demonstrates that revenue growth alone does not guarantee value creation. The significant drop in economic profit in 2021, despite a relatively high sales figure, suggests increased costs or a higher cost of capital eroded profitability.

The volatility observed in 2021 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying factors contributing to the substantial decline in economic profit and the resulting negative economic profit margin. The 2022 recovery, while positive, indicates that sustained improvement in economic value creation remains a key focus.