Stock Analysis on Net

Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE:TM)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since June 24, 2015.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Toyota Motor Corp., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in millions, translated from JPY ¥

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011 Mar 31, 2010
Land 11,294 12,760 13,845 15,127 14,884 13,557
Buildings 35,702 39,555 41,146 44,542 43,723 39,703
Machinery and equipment 91,242 100,809 103,188 110,651 107,605 99,946
Vehicles and equipment on operating leases 43,348 36,022 32,264 31,334 29,969 28,087
Construction in progress 4,847 2,783 3,096 3,350 3,594 2,431
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 186,432 191,928 193,539 205,004 199,776 183,725
Accumulated depreciation (108,942) (117,727) (120,777) (129,139) (123,899) (111,596)
Property, plant and equipment, net 77,490 74,202 72,762 75,865 75,877 72,129

Based on: 20-F (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2011-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2010-03-31).

Item Description The company
Property, plant and equipment, at cost Amount before accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of physical assets used in the normal conduct of business and not intended for resale. Examples include, but are not limited to, land, buildings, machinery and equipment, office equipment, and furniture and fixtures. Toyota Motor Corp. property, plant and equipment, at cost decreased from 2013 to 2014 and from 2014 to 2015.
Property, plant and equipment, net Amount after accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of physical assets used in the normal conduct of business to produce goods and services and not intended for resale. Examples include, but are not limited to, land, buildings, machinery and equipment, office equipment, and furniture and fixtures. Toyota Motor Corp. property, plant and equipment, net increased from 2013 to 2014 and from 2014 to 2015.

Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Toyota Motor Corp., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011 Mar 31, 2010
Average age ratio 62.20% 65.71% 67.21% 68.01% 67.01% 65.58%

Based on: 20-F (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2011-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2010-03-31).

Asset age ratio Description The company
Average age ratio As long as straight-line depreciation is used, this is an accurate estimate of asset age as a percentage of depreciable life. The relative age is a useful measure of whether the company fixed asset base is old or new. Newer assets are likely to be more efficient. Toyota Motor Corp. average age ratio of depreciable property, plant and equipment improved from 2013 to 2014 and from 2014 to 2015.

Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011 Mar 31, 2010
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions, translated from JPY ¥)
Accumulated depreciation 108,942 117,727 120,777 129,139 123,899 111,596
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 186,432 191,928 193,539 205,004 199,776 183,725
Land 11,294 12,760 13,845 15,127 14,884 13,557
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 62.20% 65.71% 67.21% 68.01% 67.01% 65.58%

Based on: 20-F (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2011-03-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2010-03-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, at cost – Land)
= 100 × 108,942 ÷ (186,43211,294) = 62.20%

Asset age ratio Description The company
Average age As long as straight-line depreciation is used, this is an accurate estimate of asset age as a percentage of depreciable life. The relative age is a useful measure of whether the company fixed asset base is old or new. Newer assets are likely to be more efficient. Toyota Motor Corp. average age ratio of depreciable property, plant and equipment improved from 2013 to 2014 and from 2014 to 2015.